China’s Economic Miracle
Show Less

China’s Economic Miracle

Does FDI Matter?

Sumei Tang, Eliyathamby A. Selvanathan and Saroja Selvanathan

This insightful book analyses the impact of Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) in China as well as making valuable contributions to the theory of FDI more broadly. The authors provide empirical analysis of key factors including the location-specific determinants of FDI; the impact of FDI on domestic investment, income distribution, consumption and tourism; the relationship between FDI inflows and income inequality; causality between FDI, domestic investment and economic growth; and causality between FDI and tourism. The study concludes that FDI plays a crucial and positive role in the economic development of China. Rather than crowding out domestic investment, FDI is found to stimulate economic growth by complementing it.
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 9: FDI Spill-over Effects on Consumption

Sumei Tang, Eliyathamby A. Selvanathan and Saroja Selvanathan


9.1 INTRODUCTION Economic reforms have marked the beginning of globalization in China with a sign of vigour and prosperity since 1978. It is commonly believed that globalization provides more and more countries with opportunities to enjoy higher standards of living. Indeed, China is one of the countries in the globalization era evidently and revolutionarily pulling hundreds of millions of people out of poverty towards higher standards of living. In the last quarter of last century, the real income per capita in China increased dramatically from US$241 in 1978 to US$1272 in 2004. Accordingly, the household saving ratio has also risen sharply over the same period. The share of savings in GDP has increased from 2 per cent in 1978 to 24 per cent in 2004. In sharp contrast, consumer confidence and private consumption spending over the same period in China have continuously declined and plunged to an exceptionally weak point in 2004, despite the interest rate being cut eight times over the period 1996 to 2004. The household consumption rate1 fell from 50 per cent in 1978 to 43 per cent in 2004, a record low consumption rate since 1952. The economic phenomenon in China in the globalization era seems to defy the traditional consumption hypotheses. The Keynesian absolute income hypothesis has played a key role in explaining aggregate consumption, which gave primary importance to disposable national income as the chief determinant of aggregate consumption, but its empirical inadequacies have led to development of the life-cycle hypothesis (LCH)...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.