Chapter 7 Assessing and addressing betterment and compensation in Guangzhou: empirical evidence
Restricted access

In China, constrained by the lack of accurate and adequate data, the evaluation of betterment and worsenment is very difficult either at the municipal level or at the project level. This chapter seeks to fill this gap by adopting a case study approach at two levels: municipal level and project level. The adoption of this two-level case study approach is based on the different activities of the main stakeholders – the government, the developer and the individual – in betterment and compensation schemes. To elaborate, the municipal government is responsible for providing public facilities, and charging fees and taxes for using public facilities. However, it is not possible to allocate the government’s costs in an individual project. Therefore, it is easier to identify the costs and financial benefits of government at the municipal level rather than at the project level. At the project level, the quantification of betterment and worsenment can be easier than that at the municipal level, and some assessment methods, such as repeat-sales and hedonic regression, have been developed over the last few decades to identify impacts of government actions, for example, the construction of infrastructure facilities on the real estate market.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Other access options

Redeem Token

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institutional Access

Personal login

Log in with your Elgar Online account

Login with you Elgar account