Chapter 3 analyses the practice of States (both successor States and other States parties to BITs) regarding the continuation of the predecessor State’s BITs after the date of succession. In many instances, the parties have mutually and expressly agreed upon a solution regarding succession to treaties. The practice of the following new States will be examined: The practice of the FRY and Serbia-Montenegro regarding SFRY’s BITs; the practice of the Czech Republic regarding Czechoslovakia’s BITs; the practice of Kosovo regarding Serbia’s BITs; the practice of new States in the context of the break-up of the USSR and the practice of Montenegro regarding Serbia-Montenegro’s BITs.
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your Elgar Online account
-
Frontmatter
-
PART A GENERAL INTRODUCTION
-
PART B STATE SUCCESSION TO BILATERAL INVESTMENT TREATIES
-
PART C STATE SUCCESSION TO MULTILATERAL TREATIES
-
PART D STATE SUCCESSION TO STATE CONTRACTS
-
PART E SPECIFIC PROBLEMS ARISING WHEN STATE SUCCESSION OCCURS DURING ARBITRATION PROCEEDINGS
-
PART F GENERAL CONCLUSION
-
Back Matter
