This Chapter examines what happens when succession occurs during the arbitration proceedings. Such changes may affect the identity of the respondent State in the proceedings. For example, in the context of the dissolution of a State, the respondent will cease to exist during the proceedings. It will be argued that a tribunal should continue to have jurisdiction over a case despite the changes affecting the respondent State during proceedings. This chapter will examine the practical consequences of changes affecting the respondent State which may be different depending on the type of succession involved.
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your Elgar Online account
-
Frontmatter
-
PART A GENERAL INTRODUCTION
-
PART B STATE SUCCESSION TO BILATERAL INVESTMENT TREATIES
-
PART C STATE SUCCESSION TO MULTILATERAL TREATIES
-
PART D STATE SUCCESSION TO STATE CONTRACTS
-
PART E SPECIFIC PROBLEMS ARISING WHEN STATE SUCCESSION OCCURS DURING ARBITRATION PROCEEDINGS
-
PART F GENERAL CONCLUSION
-
Back Matter
