Chapter 33 Evolution of space programs governance
Restricted access

This chapter discusses the evolution of space program governance from the “Old Space” paradigm to the “New Space” one. For both paradigms, we discuss archetypical governance models, rationale, and pros and cons. Ultimately, we explain the driving forces underpinning the evolution of program governance models and show three governance archetypes. Traditionally program architectures and governance models were quite homogeneous and mostly government led (archetype 1), while in the New Space paradigm, programs may also include partnerships with private actors (archetype 2), or being directly led and owned by private actors (archetype 3).

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Other access options

Redeem Token

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institutional Access

Personal login

Log in with your Elgar Online account

Login with you Elgar account