The Global Tobacco Epidemic and the Law
Show Less

The Global Tobacco Epidemic and the Law

Edited by Andrew D. Mitchell and Tania Voon

Tobacco use represents a critical global health challenge. The World Health Organization estimates that tobacco kills nearly 6 million people a year, with the toll expected to rise to 8 million annually over the next two decades. Written by health and legal experts from institutions around the globe, The Global Tobacco Epidemic and the Law examines the key areas of domestic and international law affecting the regulation of tobacco.
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 15: Tobacco control in Taiwan

Chuan-Feng Wu


Scientific evidence demonstrates that smoke and the inhalation of second-hand smoke causes serious illnesses, from lung cancer, emphysema and cardiovascular disease to early death. Taiwan is facing a public health crisis due to smoking and spends an estimated US$1.5 billion annually via National Health Insurance (NHI) expenditures to treat smoking-related illnesses. In 2009, 20 per cent of Taiwanese adults used tobacco regularly (35.4 per cent of males; 4.2 per cent of females) as did 14.8 per cent of teenagers (19.6 per cent of males; 9.1 per cent of females). Additionally, in one survey, 20.8 per cent of respondents reported daily exposure to second-hand smoke in their households, 14 per cent in the workplace or office, and 7.8 per cent in indoor public places. Besides its impact on public health, tobacco consumption also causes serious economic losses, such as increasing health care costs and job productivity losses. Studies also show that smoking greatly impacts the mortality and death rates in Taiwan. From 1982 to 1986, Taiwan’s smokers had a 140 per cent increase in risk of death from all cancer sites combined, and 730 per cent increase from lung cancer. To respond to the tobacco epidemic, Taiwan passed the Tobacco Hazards Prevention Act 1997 (Taiwan) (1997 THPA). However, the Act failed to incorporate effective tobacco control initiatives, such as tobacco advertising bans, graphic health warnings, cigarette tax increases, bans on smoking in public places, and tobacco cessation subsidisations. Therefore, the THPA was regarded as inept in preventing or retarding the ‘tobacco epidemic’.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.