Chapter 10 Path dependence and possibilism: the American, Korean, and Japanese welfare states in comparative perspective
Restricted access

This concluding chapter undertakes the exercise in three steps. First, it comments briefly on the concept of the small welfare state: what it means, some of the limitations of the concept and how being “small” has implications for the distribution of risk and the role of private actors. Second, it reexamines the core causal arguments of the book, highlighting some nuances in the chapters but also raising the role of causal factors that are addressed only in passing. These include the particular role international political factors—the Cold War and globalization—played in the three cases of the US, Japan, and Korea. It also looks at some distinctive issues that differentiate the three countries, particularly the role of federalism and race and ethnicity in the American case. Third, following the title, it raises some issues about the path of future change in these welfare states.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Other access options

Redeem Token

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institutional Access

Personal login

Log in with your Elgar Online account

Login with you Elgar account