Handbook of Research on Venture Capital: Volume 2
Show Less

Handbook of Research on Venture Capital: Volume 2

A Globalizing Industry

Edited by Hans Landström and Colin Mason

This Handbook charts the development of venture capital research in light of the global financial crisis, starting with an analysis of the current venture capital market and the changing nature of the business angel market. Looking at governance structures; the performance of venture capitalists in terms of investments, economic impact and human capital; geographical organization of business angels and venture capital global ‘hotspots’; this book also analyses the current state of venture capital research and offers a roadmap for the future.
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 10: Global venture capital ‘hotspots’: China

Haitian Lu and Yi Tan


The fact that China has become an international hotspot for venture capital (VC) is of recent origin. Though the Chinese domestic VC industry can be traced back to the mid-1980s, its substantive development did not take place until the late 1990s. Whereas foreign direct investment in China in the 1980s and 1990s mostly took the form of greenfield investment, entering into the new millennium the primary form has become mergers and acquisitions, of which foreign private equity (including VC) plays an important role. A 2006 survey by Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu (2006) reports that US VC firms named China as their top destination for international investments. This change is consonant with two global trends in the VC industry in the last three decades. One has been VC internationalization. Once exclusively among OECD countries, since the 1990s highgrowth opportunities in developing countries like China and India have increasingly attracted Western (mostly US) venture capitalists (Patricof, 1989; Bruton et al., 2005). The other global trend has been the booming domestic VC markets outside the US and Europe. Armour (2004) and Gilson (2003) suggest that the VC markets in developing and transitional economies are primarily driven by their governments with an objective to replicate US success in fostering innovation and entrepreneurship. This has facilitated the development of domestic VC in these countries together with the necessary institutional settings for such activities. Despite this, there are marked differences between Chinese and Western society, and a general consensus among academics and practitioners on VC is that these differences have profound impacts on the organizations and behavior of VC activities (Bruton and Ahlstrom, 2003). For example, researchers have yet to determine to what extent the institutional (formal and informal) environment of China differs from that in developed markets. To what extent can the established US model of VC investment be applied to China? At what stage is China’s VC market and academic research today? Which mainstream economics, management or finance theories exhibit more potential to explain the organizational and behavioral divides between East and West? These are all legitimate questions for subsequent researchers who wish to accumulate knowledge in exploring the Chinese VC industry. To provide a conceptual and analytical framework on these important questions is therefore the principal objective of this chapter.This chapter is organized into four parts.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.