Browse by title

You are looking at 1 - 10 of 508 items :

  • Development Economics x
  • Economics and Finance x
  • All accessible content x
Clear All
This content is available to you

Edited by Inge Amundsen

This content is available to you

Stefano Ponte, Gary Gereffi and Gale Raj-Reichert

This introductory chapter provides an overview of what global value chains (GVCs) are, and why they are important. It presents a genealogy of the emergence of GVCs as a concept and analytical framework, and some reflections on more recent developments in this field. Finally, it describes the chapter organization of this Handbook along its five cross-cutting themes: mapping, measuring and analysing GVCs; governance, power and inequality; the multiple dimensions of upgrading and downgrading; how innovation, strategy and learning can shape governance and upgrading; and GVCs, development and public policy.

This content is available to you

Shafiullah Jan and Mehmet Asutay

This content is available to you

Edited by Marek Hudon, Marc Labie and Ariane Szafarz

This content is available to you

Jonathan Morduch and Timothy Ogden

The rhetoric of social investment is grand and clear, and the basic vision is simple: to support a new sort of capitalist endeavor driven by pursuit of social progress rather than just pursuit of profit. Yet the reality can be messy. How could it not be? Modern history has been shaped by the tensions between unbridled capitalism and struggles for social and economic justice. So it is not surprising that in the same 12 months that publishers release hope-filled books on social investment like A World of Three Zeros: The New Economics of Zero Poverty, Zero Unemployment and Zero Net Carbon Emissions (Yunus 2017), other publishers release bubblebursting exposes like Winners Take All: The Elite Charade of Changing the World (Giridharadas 2018). Against the backdrop of these tensions, the world of social investment somehow embraces both market denialism and market fundamentalism. It depends on large subsidies while deploying anti-subsidy rhetoric. Definitions and practice have become so squishy that the coiner of one of the seminal terms of social investment, the “triple-bottom line”, recently suggested “recalling” the term because it is now essentially meaningless (Elkington 2018).

This content is available to you

Markus Krajewski and Rhea Tamara Hoffmann

This content is available to you

Edited by Markus Krajewski and Rhea T. Hoffmann

This content is available to you

Colin White

This content is available to you

Nanak Kakwani and Hyun Hwa Son

This content is available to you

David Kaufmann