Environmental Education in China
Show Less

Environmental Education in China

Gerald A. McBeath, Jenifer Huang McBeath, Tian Qing and Huang Yu

China’s environmental problems increasingly attract global attention, yet critics often overlook the sizable efforts of the Chinese people and government to change attitudes and behavior, in order to improve environmental outcomes. This much-needed book provides a comprehensive introduction to environmental education in China. After consideration of the environment in Chinese philosophy, the authors focus on application of directives and new guidelines to compulsory, secondary and college education, and also analyze the way in which teachers are trained. They then examine conditioning factors, such as the media and NGOs, as well as the variation of education within China, and attempt to measure the efficacy of environmental education over time.
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 2: Confucianism as an environmental ethic

Gerald A. McBeath, Jenifer Huang McBeath, Tian Qing and Huang Yu


Within the previous two decades, Confucianism has re-emerged in China as a moral anchor for the state, providing a legitimating veneer for the spiritless materialism of ‘socialism with market characteristics’. Although Confucianism has been applied to many areas of life, in this chapter we discuss the relevance of Confucianism to environmentalism only. We mention other systems, such as Daoism too, that have an even deeper connection to environmentalism. The chapter unfolds in four parts. First, we treat the framework questions of environmental ethics such as the population of the moral universe, and then present the way Western environmental philosophers categorize relationships between humans and the environment. Second, we focus on selected Confucians and what they have to say about human relationships to non-human animals, ecosystems, the earth as a system, and the cosmos. Third, we consider the role that ecology has played in Chinese philosophy, and in this section emphasize Daoism. In the fourth part we ask how relevant Confucianism is to policy-making on environmental issues. To make the periodization clear, we follow Tucker and Berthong who use Confucianism to refer to the early part of the overall tradition in the classical era. This stretches from the first millennium BCE through the Han Dynasty (206 BCE to 220 CE) and T’ang Dynasty up to the ninth century. Neo-Confucianism refers to a later development in the tradition from the tenth, eleventh and twelfth centuries continuing to the twentieth century.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.