The Dynamics of Regions and Networks in Industrial Ecosystems
Show Less

The Dynamics of Regions and Networks in Industrial Ecosystems

Edited by Matthias Ruth and Brynhildur Davidsdottir

Industrial ecology provides a rigorous and comprehensive description of human production and consumption processes in the larger context of environmental and socioeconomic change. This volume offers methodologies for such descriptions, with contributions covering both basic and advanced analytical concepts and tools to explore the dynamics of industrial ecosystems, concentrating specifically on regions and networks.
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 2: Dynamics of Geographically Based Industrial Ecosystems

Marian R. Chertow


Marian R. Chertow INTRODUCTION 2.1 Central to the field of industrial ecology is ‘the biological analogy’, which focuses on ‘the flow and especially the cycling of materials, nutrients and energy in ecosystems as a potential model for relationships between facilities and firms’ (Lifset and Graedel 2002). The seminal work by Frosch and Gallopoulos (1989) described an industrial ecosystem in which ‘the consumption of energy and materials is optimized and the effluents of one process . . . serve as the raw material for another process’.1 The industrial ecology subfield of industrial symbiosis, which arose to examine the dynamics of industrial ecosystems, pays resolute attention to the flow of materials and energy through networks of businesses in geographic proximity sharing resources including water, energy, by-products and wastes (Chertow 2000). The goal of this chapter is to explore these geographically based industrial ecosystems by comparing some of their dynamics with those of natural ecosystems, drawing on principles of industrial ecology, ecosystem science, and borrowings from thermodynamics and complex adaptive systems theory coupled with recent findings from the industrial symbiosis literature. Several scholars, including Ehrenfeld (2004a, 2004b) and Levine (2003), have sought to analyze whether the relationship of ecology and industrial ecology is metaphoric (chosen to bring together dissimilar items for comparison), analogous (still comparing two unlike things but emphasizing key points of resemblance in some particulars) or even whether the two can be analyzed under the same framework (Spiegelman 2003), perhaps owing to similarities in structure (Baldwin et al. 2004) (see Table 2.1). This chapter...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.