Changing Big Business
Show Less

Changing Big Business

The Globalisation of the Fair Trade Movement

Anna Hutchens

Drawing on candid accounts from practitioners, producers and industry representatives, this informative and proactive volume investigates the challenges facing today’s fair trade movement and provides unique insights into the workings of social and economic power in world markets.
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 1: ‘Game-Playing’: Rethinking Power and Empowerment

Anna Hutchens


For social scientists, the exercise of power has traditionally been an instrument of domination, involving coercion, struggle and force. This view of power – as ‘power over’ – prevailed in the social sciences in the twentieth century (Clegg, 1989; Lukes, 1974). More recent scholarship has advanced our understanding of how power is exercised in the modern world (see especially Foucault, 1977, 1979). In contrast to the traditional ‘power over’ perspective, contemporary social theory creates space for individual agency, but until recently this space has lacked theoretical development. An emergent research agenda now questions how disempowered groups exercise agency positively to achieve empowerment (see O’Malley, 1996; O’Malley et al., 1997; Townsend et al., 1999; Rowlands, 1995, 1997; Bevir and Rhodes, 2005; Eyben et al., 2006). Braithwaite’s (2009) conceptual framework of ‘defiance’ extends this incipient intellectual programme with a typology of individual psychologies and behaviours for defying institutional and structural constraints. Elaborating Braithwaite’s psychological framework to the level of collective action and transnational structure, the chapter focuses on one type of defiance, game-playing, and develops a conceptual scheme of empowerment through which game-playing can be understood to trigger global transformations. ‘POWER OVER’: A LEGACY AND ITS LIMITATIONS According to Steward Clegg (1989: 22), twentieth-century thought on power has been grounded in a notion of ‘human agency’ that is ‘expressed through causal relations measurable in terms of mechanistic indicators’. For Dahl (cited in Lukes, 1974: 16) for instance, ‘A has power over B to the extent that A can get B to do...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.