The Handbook on the Political Economy of War
Show Less

The Handbook on the Political Economy of War

Edited by Christopher J. Coyne and Rachel L. Mathers

By defining political economy and war in the broadest sense, this unique Handbook brings together a wide range of interdisciplinary scholars from economics, political science, sociology, and policy studies to address a multitude of important topics. These include an analysis of why wars begin, how wars are waged, what happens after war has ceased, and the various alternatives to war. Other sections explore civil war and revolution, the arms trade, economic and political systems, and post-conflict reconstruction and nation building. Policymakers as well as academics and students of political science, economics, public policy and sociology will find this volume to be an engaging and enlightening read.
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 2: Theories and Causes of War

Jack S. Levy


Jack S. Levy 2.1 INTRODUCTION The question of what causes war has engaged scholars, journalists, public intellectuals and others for thousands of years. We have a variety of theories but no consensus as to what the causes of war are or how best to study them. There are enormous differences across different disciplines – philosophy, theology, literature, history, economics, political science, anthropology, sociology, psychology, mathematics, biology and primatology, to name a few – but substantial differences within disciplines as well, driven by different ontological and epistemological perspectives, theoretical preconceptions and methodological preferences.1 Both the complexity of war and of the study of war complicates the task of writing a relatively short essay on the causes of war. I use this essay to place the chapters in this volume on the political economy of war and peace in the broader context of some of the leading theories in political science on the causes of war. Although it is clear that a complete understanding of the causes of war needs to draw on work in many disciplines, it is also clear that political science has a special place in the study of war. Leading scholars in several disciplines define war as large-scale organized violence between political organizations (Malinowski 1941; Vasquez 2009). Many also accept Clausewitz’ ([1832] 1976) argument that war is fundamentally political, a “continuation of politics by other means.” If war is an instrument of policy to advance the interests of a political organization, then an explanation of war requires an understanding of...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.