Politicians, Economists and the Supreme Court at Work
Show Less

Politicians, Economists and the Supreme Court at Work

The Founders Betrayed

Timothy P. Roth

Presented as an engaging thought experiment, Politicians, Economists and the Supreme Court at Work examines the metastasizing federal role through two different means: first, as it relates to the increasing concerns of a contemporary nation, and second, the depth to which that nation’s Founders would be appalled by the actions of their successors. Additionally, the book provides a critical appraisal of the burgeoning federal enterprise and the federal government’s ‘on-, off-, and off-off’ budget activities – ultimately answering the question, ‘What would the Founders do?’
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 2: The Founders’ Vision

Timothy P. Roth


INTRODUCTION A critical assessment of the burgeoning federal enterprise can proceed in many ways, and involve numerous dimensions of appraisal. Typically, however, the assessment is outcomes based and procedurally-detached, with economic efficiency and some measure of distributive justice as the ultimate standards of appraisal. Here, the approach is different. Attention centers on a comparison of federal on-, off- and off-off-budget activity with the post-constitutional federal role envisioned by the United States’ Founders. The comparison is informed by an appreciation of the Founders’ moral and political philosophy, their political economy and their understanding of the nation’s fundamental law, the Constitution. A recurring theme of the book is that much of what the federal government does is fundamentally discriminatory; that, whereas the Founders focused on fair, in the sense of impartial procedure, on the cultivation of virtue and on the reciprocal relationship between law and morality, modern statutory and administrative law is increasingly animated by the ‘politics of wants and needs’, and by the impulse to ‘perfect the economic market’. Modern liberalism, and the economic theory to which it is conjoined, social welfare theory, have been instrumentally important to this enterprise, as has a constitutional jurisprudence that has undermined both federalism and the separation of powers. I shall argue that, just as Madison feared, the relentless advance of the ‘responsive state’ has been underwritten by ‘the high sanction given to a latitude in expounding the Constitution which seems to break down the landmarks intended by a specification of the Powers of Congress’...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.