The International Handbook on Private Enforcement of Competition Law
Show Less

The International Handbook on Private Enforcement of Competition Law

Edited by Albert A. Foer and Jonathan W. Cuneo

With the international community on the brink of an explosion of private remedies for violation of national competition laws, this timely Handbook provides state-of-the-art analysis of the private enforcement of competition laws across the globe. Private enforcement of antitrust is becoming a significant component of competition policy laws worldwide; today, more than a hundred jurisdictions have adopted market regimes operating within a framework of competition law, providing a varied base for developing ways by which persons injured by anticompetitive conduct will (or will not) be able to obtain remedies.
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 13: Interaction of Public and Private Enforcement

Kevin J. O’Connor, Hannah L. Renfro and Adam C. Briggs


Kevin J. O’Connor, Hannah L. Renfro and Adam C. Briggs1 Introduction One of the unique features of the American system of antitrust enforcement is the multiplicity of potential plaintiffs, governmental and private, authorized to challenge allegedly unlawful conduct under federal and state antitrust law.2 Not only do the United States Department of Justice (DOJ) and Federal Trade Commission (FTC) maintain overlapping antitrust enforcement authority,3 but other federal agencies also possess the authority to block business transactions in certain industrial sectors.4 In addition, state attorneys general and private plaintiffs are empowered to sue under federal and state antitrust law. Although similar to their federal equivalent, state antitrust laws often present potential plaintiffs with remedies beyond those obtainable under federal law.5 In short, the United States antitrust enforcement system has evolved into a system including multiple enforcers, each possessing concurrent enforcement authority: two federal antitrust agencies, other federal agencies reviewing industry-specific transactions, fifty state attorneys general, and thousands of private parties. However, except for certain non-antitrust federal agencies, all federal litigants operate in an integrated federal court system under a single body of federal precedent.6 Even most state antitrust laws 1 Kevin J. O’Connor is a shareholder with Godfrey & Kahn, S.C., and chairs the firm’s Antitrust and Trade Regulation Practice Group. Before joining Godfrey & Kahn, O’Connor headed the Wisconsin Department of Justice’s Office of Consumer Protection and Antitrust. While an Assistant Attorney General in Wisconsin DOJ, O’Connor also chaired the National Association of Attorneys General’s Multistate Antitrust Task Force. He has...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.