Chapter 3: Platform competition, the Apple eBooks case and the meaning of agreement to fix prices
Looking out on the devastation wrought by the English Civil Wars, political philosophers found themselves contemplating how to harness collective action to obviate problems of collective irrationality.With the advent of competition law more than two centuries later, American courts were situated to take up certain manifestations of collective action: those that obtain from conspiracy to restrain trade.Building on the game theory advances of 1950, economists found ways to characterize the governance of antitrust conspiracies as the mechanisms by which conspirators harness collective action among themselves to obviate, or at least mitigate, their own problems of collective irrationality (profit-diminishing competition).Characterization of the governance of conspiracies can impose structure on the meaning of agreement in the antitrust case law to unreasonably restrain trade.From a governance perspective, the district court’s analysis of agreement in the Apple eBooks price-fixing case,952 F.Supp.2d 638 (S.D.N.Y. 2013), would appear truncated.
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.
Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.
Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.