Institutional Variety in East Asia
Show Less

Institutional Variety in East Asia

Formal and Informal Patterns of Coordination

Edited by Werner Pascha, Cornelia Storz and Markus Taube

This illuminating book broadly addresses the emerging field of ‘diversity of capitalism’ from a comparative institutional approach. It explores the varied patterns for achieving coordination in different economic systems, applying them specifically to China, Japan and South Korea. These countries are of particular interest due to the fact that they are often considered to have developed their own peculiar blend of models of capitalism.
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 11: The Role of Institutional Conditions in Japanese FDI in European Transition Economies

Norifumi Kawai


Norifumi Kawai 11.1 INTRODUCTION The decision as to the location of foreign direct investment (FDI) abroad has been as important as entry timing and entry mode in the internationalization process of multinational enterprises (MNEs) (Dunning 1998; Meyer and Nguyen 2005). Where to invest, particularly in transition countries where market-supporting institutions are underdeveloped, can be a pivotal concern to multinational managers because failure to adapt to local institutional environments leads to increased transaction and agency costs (Meyer 2001). Drawing on North’s (1990) institutional economics, scholars of international business and strategy have documented that formal institutions (e.g. laws, taxation, regulation, intellectual property rights protection, etc.) matter for FDI location decision making (e.g. Bevan et al. 2004; Grosse and Trevino 2005; Trevino et al. 2008). North (1990) asserts that institutions influence the behavioral patterns of multiple economic agents in maximizing economic efficiency. However, previous research has failed to study the link between institutions and foreign investors’ business activity in a sociological dimension of institutional isomorphism that underscores the importance of legitimacy. Advancing our knowledge of how institutional advantages or disadvantages affect foreign firms’ location strategies has practical implications for both potential investors and host governments of such economies. For foreign firms investing in economies in transition, institutions should be treated as crucial locational variables since they have a significant influence over firm-specific factors such as resource commitment to knowledge spillover in either a positive or negative direction (Bevan et al. 2004; Dunning 2005). The extant literature suggests that organizational outcomes can be improved...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.