Show Less
You do not have access to this content

COPYRIGHT IN THE INFORMATION SOCIETY

A Guide to National Implementation of the European Directive, Second Edition

BRIGITTE LINDNER, TED SHAPIRO

This substantially revised second edition evaluates the Directive on Copyright in the Information Society and its interpretation by the European Court of Justice in the light of its implementation and application in the EU’s 28 member states. Following the initial implementation of the Directive, many member states have enacted further legislation to supplement or refine their earlier implementation: this edition will take these important developments into account.
Show Summary Details
This content is available to you

TABLE OF CASES

INTERNATIONAL

World Trade Organization

WTO Panel Report on the validity of section 110(5) of the US Copyright Act 1976, 15 June 2000 30.52

EUROPEAN UNION

European Commission

NBC Universal, Paramount Pictures, Sky UK, Sony Pictures Entertainment, The Walt Disney Company, Twentieth Century Fox Int Ltd, Warner Bros Entertainment UK Ltd, Case AT.40023 —Cross-border access to pay-TV (pending) 2.004

Court of Justice

Levola Hengelo BV v Smilde Foods BV, Case C-310/17 Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) 13 November 2018 30.12

Land Nordrhein-Westfalen v Dirk Renckhoff, Case C-161/17, Opinion of AG Manuel Campos Sánchez-Bordona 25 April 2018, ECLI:EU:C:2018:279 2.083, 30.25, 30.27

MEO -Serviços de Comunicações e Multimédia SA v Autoridade da Concorrência, Case C-525/16, Judgment of 19 April 2018, ECLI:EU:C:2018:270 2.158

VCAST Ltd.v RTI SpA, Case C-265/16, Judgment of 29 November 2017, ECLI:EU:C:2017:913 2.119, 2.123, 13.049, 17.068

Autortiesību un komunicēšanās konsultāciju aģentūra/Latvijas Autoru apvienība v Konkurences padome,Case C-177/16, Judgment of 14 September 2017, ECLI:EU:C:2017:689 2.158

Stichting Brein v Ziggo BV and XS4ALL Internet BV, Case C-610/15, Judgment of 14 June 2017, ECLI:EU:C:2017:456 2.042, 22.047, 22.073, 28.021

Stichting Brein v Jack Frederik Wullems, Case C527/15, Judgment of 26 April 2017, ECLI:EU:C:2017:300 2.018, 19.14, 19.15, 19.16, 19.17, 19.19, 22.072, 28.021, 29.078, 30.30, 30.50

Staatlich genehmigte Gesellschaft der Autoren, Komponisten und Musikverleger registrierte Genossenschaft mbH (AKM) v Zürs.net Betriebs GmbH, Case C-138/16, Judgment of 16 March 2017, ECLI:EU:C:2017:218 2.058, 17.033, 19.15, 19.17, 19.19, 22.078, 23.45

ITV Broadcasting Ltd.and Others v TVCatchup Ltd.and Others, Case C-275/15, Judgment of 1 March 2017, ECLI:EU:C:2017:144 16.076, 30.31

Stowarzyszenie Oławska Telewizja Kablowa, Case C-367/15, Judgment of 25 January 2017, ECLI:EU:C:2017:36 17.114, 27.43

Tele2 Sverige AB v Post-och telestyrelsen and Secretary of State for the Home Department v Tom Watson and Others, Joined Cases C-203/15 and C-698/15, Judgment of 21 December 2016, ECLI:EU:C:2016:970 11.46

Marc Soulier, Sara Doke v Premier Ministre, Ministre de la Culture et de la Communication, Case C-301/15, Judgment of 16 November 2016, ECLI:EU:C:2016:878 2.021, 12.31, 13.063

Aleksandrs Ranks and Jurijs Vasiļevičs v Finanšu un ekonomisko noziegumu izmeklēšanas prokoratūra, Microsoft Corp., Case C-166/15, Judgment of 12 October 2016, ECLI:EU:C:2016:762 20.026

Microsoft Mobile Sales International Oy and Others v Ministero per i beni e le attivitàculturali (MiBAC) and Others, Case C-110/15, Judgment of 22 September 2016, ECLI:EU:C:2016:717 17.075, 22.116

Tobias Mc Fadden v Sony Music Entertainment Germany GmbH, Case C-484/14, Judgment of 15 September 2016, ECLI:EU:C:2016:689 2.223

GS Media v Sanoma, Case C-160/15, Judgment of 8 September 2016, ECLI:EU:C:2016:644 2.034, 4.031, 4.118, 8.61, 13.031, 22.070, 23.24, 28.021, 30.028, 30.029, 30.030

Entidad de Gestión de Derechos de los Productores Audiovisuales (EGEDA) and Others v Administración del Estado and Asociación Multisectorial de Empresas de la Electrónica, las Tecnologías de la Información y la Comunicación, de las Telecomunicaciones y de los contenidos Digitales (AMETIC), Case C-470/14, Judgment of 9 June 2016, as rectified by order of the Court 7 September 2016, ECLI:EU:C:2016:418 2.126

Reha Training Gesellschaft für Sport-und Unfallrehabilitation mbH v Gesellschaft für musikalische Aufführungs-und mechanische Vervielfältigungsrechte eV, Case C-117/15, Judgment of 31 May 2016, ECLI:EU:C:2016:379 2.031, 13.022, 13.025, 13.026, 19.15, 19.17, 20.081, 22.074, 27.11, 30.24, 30.25

Liffers v Producciones Mandarina SL, Case C-99/15, Judgment of 17 March 2016, ECLI:EU:C:2016:173 17.115, 27.43

SBS Belgium NV v Belgische Vereniging van Auteurs, Componisten en Uitgevers (SABAM), Case C-325/14, Judgment of 19 November 2015, ECLI:EU:C:2015:764 2.032, 4.033, 19.16

Hewlett-Packard Belgium SPRL v Reprobel SCRL, Case C-572/13, Judgment of 12 November 2015, ECLI:EU:C:2015:750 4.045, 13.063, 15.052, 22.084

Dimensione Direct Sales srl and Michele Labiancav Knoll International Spa, Case C-516/13, Judgment of 13 May 2015, ECLI:EU:C:2015:315 19.21, 22.034

C More Entertainment AB v Linus Sandberg, Case C-279/13, Judgment of 26 March 2015, ECLI:EU:C:2015:199 2.026, 22.066, 22.067, 29.051

Copydan Båndkopi v Nokia Danmark A/S, Case C-463/12, Judgment of 5 March 2015, ECLI:EU:C:2015:144 2.131, 3.034, 3.065, 9.43, 16.027, 22.115

Art & Allposters International BV v Stichting Pictoright, Case C-419/13, Judgment of 22 January 2015, ECLI:EU:C:2015:27, Opinion of AG Cruz Villalón of 11 September 2014, ECLI:EU:C:2014:2214 2.085, 22.034, 28.027, 30.19

BestWater International GmbH v Michael Mebes and Stefan Potsch, C-348/13, Judgment of 21 October 2014, ECLI:EU:C:2014:2315 2.042, 3.015, 4.030, 13.029, 13.030

Technische Universität Darmstadt v Eugen Ulmer KG, C-117/13, Judgment of 11 September 2014, ECLI:EU:C:2014:2196 2.091, 2.112, 13.054, 22.146, 26.125, 30.50

Johan Deckmyn and Vrijheidsfonds VZW v HelenaVandersteen and Others, Case C-201/13, Judgment of 3 September 2014, ECLI:EU:C:2014:2132 2.091, 4.042, 13.069, 15.073, 17.033, 18.058, 22.144, 26.122, 30.33, 30.035

Public Relations Consultants Association Ltd. v Newspaper Licensing Agency Ltd. and Others, Case C-360/13, Judgment of 5 June 2014, ECLI:EU:C:2014:1195 2.091, 2.100, 19.29, 30.51

ACI Adam BV and Others v Stichting de Thuiskopie and Stichting Onderhandelingen Thuiskopie vergoeding, Case C-435/12, Judgment of 10 April 2014, ECLI:EU:C:2014:254 2.095, 3.034, 6.36, 9.26, 11.17, 13.045, 15.044, 17.033, 18.029, 22.046, 22.110, 24.047, 25.31, 26.051, 28.044, 29.076, 30.49

UPC Telekabel Wien GmbH v Constantin Film Verleih GmbH and Wega Filmproduktionsgesellschaft mbH, Case C-314/12, Judgment of 27 March 2014, ECLI:EU:C:2014:192 2.053, 3.101, 4.038, 13.095, 13.098, 22.172

OSA –Ochrannýsvaz autorskýpro práva k dílům hudebním o.s. v LéčebnélázněMariánskéLázněa.s., Judgment of 27 February 2014, Case C-351/12, ECLI:EU:C:2014:110 2.032, 8.19, 8.20, 8.21, 8.22, 13.022, 13.026

Nils Svensson and Others v Retriever Sverige AB, Case C-466/12, Judgment of 13 February 2014, ECLI:EU:C:2014:76 2.017, 2.036, 3.015, 4.030, 9.18, 13.030, 13.080, 19.14, 20.019, 22.063, 23.24, 28.021, 29.050, 30.25, 30.27

Nintendo Co. Ltd. and Others v PC Box Srl and 9Net Srl, Case C-355/12, 23 January 2014, ECLI:EU:C:2014:25 2.077, 2.174, 4.061, 13.077, 17.134, 30.11

Amazon.com International Sales Inc. and Others v Austro-Mechana Gesellschaft zur Wahrnehmung mechanisch-musikalischer Urheberrechte Gesellschaft mbH, Case C-521/11, Judgment of 11 July 2013, ECLI:EU:C:2013:515 2.132, 3.072, 28.054

Verwertungsgesellschaft Wort (VG Wort) v Kyocera and Others (C-457/11) and Canon Deutschland GmbH (C-458/11) and Fujitsu Technology Solutions GmbH (C-459/11) and Hewlett-Packard GmbH (C-460/11) v Verwertungsgesellschaft Wort (VG Wort), Judgment of 27 June 2013, ECLI:EU:C:2013:426 2.131, 2.174, 13.066

ITV Broadcasting Ltd.and Others v TVCatchUp Ltd., Case C-607/11, Judgment of 7 March 2013, ECLI:EU:C:2013:147 2.033, 2.038, 4.039, 13.022, 13.024, 19.16, 22.063, 22.076, 30.26

Football Dataco Ltd.and Others v Sportradar GmbH and Sportradar AG, Case C-173/11, Judgment of 18 October 2012, ECLI:EU:C:2012:642 1.081, 2.062

Usedsoft GmbH v Oracle International Corp., Case C-128/11, Judgment of 3 July 2012, ECLI:EU:C:2012:407 1.084, 2.077, 13.037, 19.20, 20.026, 22.035, 27.18

Criminal proceedings against Titus Alexander Jochen Donner, Case C-5/11, Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 21 June 2012, ECLI:EU:C:2012:370 17.097

SAS Institute Inc. v World Programming Ltd., Case C-406/10, Judgment of 2 May 2012, ECLI:EU:C:2012:259 2.021, 30.06

DR and TV2 Danmark A/S v NCB–Nordisk Copyright Bureau, Case C-510/10, Judgment of 26 April 2012, ECLI:EU:C:2012:244 2.112, 9.44

Società Consortile Fonografici (SCF) v Marco Del Corso, Case C-135/10, Judgment of 15 March 2012, ECLI:EU:C:2012:140 2.032, 13.022, 13.027, 17.017, 17.020, 20.081, 22.074, 25.14, 27.11

Phonographic Performance (Ireland) Ltd. v Ireland, Attorney General, Case C-162/10, 15 March 2012, ECLI:EU:C:2012:141 2.046, 2.073, 16.074, 20.081, 25.18, 25.48

Football Dataco Ltd. and Others v Yahoo! UK Ltd. and Others, Case C-604/10, Judgment of 1 March 2012, ECLI:EU:C:2012:115 30.10

Belgische Vereniging van Auteurs, Componisten en Uitgevers (SABAM) v N.V. NETLOG, Case C-360/10, Judgment of 16 February 2012, ECLI:EU:C:2012:85 2.223, 13.095, 25.71

Martin Luksan v Petrus van der Let, C-277/10, Judgment of 9 February 2012, ECLI:EU:C:2012:65 2.094, 3.006, 17.033

Infopaq International A/S v Danske Dagblades Forening, Case C-302/10, Judgment of 17 January 2012, ECLI:EU:C:2012:16 2.021, 19.29, 19.30, 29.021, 30.50

Eva-Maria Painer v Standard Verlags GmbH and Others, Case C-145/10, Judgment of 1 December 2011, ECLI:EU:C:2011:798, Opinion of AG Trstenjak of 12 April 2011, ECLI:EU:C:2011:239 2.091, 22.126, 22.138, 25.04, 30.07

Circul Globus Bucureşti (Circ & Variete Globus Bucureşti) v Uniunea Compozitorilor şi Muzicologilor din România -Asociaţia pentru Drepturi de Autor (UCMR -ADA), Case C-283/10, Judgment of 24 November 2011, ECLI:EU:C:2011:772 2.038, 13.023, 25.50, 30.22

Scarlet Extended v Société Belge des auteurs, compositeurs et éditeurs, Case C-70/10, Judgment of 24 November 2011, ECLI:EU:C:2011:771 2.223, 13.095

Airfield NV and Canal Digitaal BV v Belgische Vereniging van Auteurs, Componisten en Uitgevers CVBA (Sabam) and Airfield NV v Agicoa Belgium BVBA, Joined cases C-431/09 and C-432/09, Judgment of 13 October 2011, ECLI:EU:C:2011:648 2.031, 4.033, 22.068

Football Association Premier League Ltd.et al. v QC Leisure et al. and Karen Murphy v Media Protection Services Ltd., Joint cases C-403/08 and C-429/08, Judgment of 4 October 2011, ECLI:EU:C:2011:631, Opinion of Advocate General Kokott delivered on 3 February 2011, ECLI:EU:C:2011:43 2.021, 2.024, 2.097, 9.12, 13.014, 13.023, 13.026, 17.033, 19.12, 19.15, 20.018, 21.23, 22.080, 24.024, 25.14, 30.06, 30.22

VEWA v Belgian State, Case C-271/10, Judgment of 30 June 2011, ECLI:EU:C:2011:442 4.060

Stichting de Thuiskopie v Mijndert van der Lee, Hananja van der Lee, Opus Supplies Deutschland GmbH, C-462/09, Judgment of 16 June 2011, ECLI:EU:C:2011:397 2.129, 25.34, 28.054

Bezpečnostnísoftwarováasociace -Svaz softwarovéochrany v Ministerstvo kultury, Case C-393/09, Judgment of 22 December 2010, ECLI:EU:C:2010:816 30.06

Peter Pammer v Reederei Karl Schlüter GmbH & Co. KG and Hotel Alpenhof GesmbH v Oliver Heller, Joined Cases C-585/08 and C-144/09, Judgment of 7 December 2010, ECLI:EU:C:2010:740 2.063

Padawan SL v Sociedad General de Autores y Editores de España (SGAE), Case C-467/08 Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) delivered on 21 October 2010, ECLI:EU:C:2010:620 2.118, 3.065, 5.10, 13.065, 19.04, 22.095, 25.34, 28.006, 28.043

Coty Prestige Lancaster v Simex Trading, Case C-127/09, Judgment of 3 June 2010, ECLI:EU:C:2010:313 27.18

Walz v Clickair, Case C-63/09, Judgment of 6 May 2010, ECLI:EU:C:2010:251 27.47

Infopaq v Danske Dagblades, Case C-5/08, Judgment of 17 July 2009, [2009] ECR I-06569, ECLI:EU:C:2009:465 2.017, 2.097, 4.016, 7.18, 9.07, 9.32, 16.018, 17.033, 19.08, 19.29, 21.10, 22.033, 22.176, 25.04, 26.025, 27.08, 29.079, 30.04

LSG-Gesellschaft zur Wahrnehmung von Leistungsschutzrechten GmbH v Tele2 Telecommunication GmbH, Case C-557/07, Order of 19 February 2009, ECLI:EU:C:2009:107 2.221

Peek & Cloppenburg, Case C-456/06, Judgment of 17 April 2008, ECLI:EU:C:2008:232 22.034, 27.15, 27.18, 27.47

Productores de Música de España (Promusicae) v Telefónica de España SAU, Case C-275/06, Judgment of 29 January 2008, ECLI:EU:C:2008:54 2.094, 28.138

Criminal proceedings against Karl Josef Wilhelm Schwibbert, Case C-20/05, Judgment of 8 November 2007, [2007] ECRI-9447 17.133

Lagardère Active Broadcast v Société pour la perception de la rémunération équitable (SPRE) and Gesellschaft zur Verwertung von Leistungsschutzrechten mbH (GVL), Case C-192/04, Judgment of 11 July 2007, [2005] ECR I-7199, ECLI:EU:C:2005:475 2.044, 22.038

SGAE v Rafael HotelesSA, Case C-306/05, Judgment of 7 December 2006, [2006] ECRI-11519, ECLI:EU:C:2006:764 2.017, 4.028, 12.14, 13.022, 13.026, 13.027, 19.12, 19.16, 19.17, 20.018, 22.037, 22.176, 23.24, 23.48, 25.14, 27.10, 27.47

Commission of the European Communities v Italian Republic, Case C-198/05, Judgment of 26 October 2006, [2006] ECR I-00107 17.058

Laserdisken ApS v Kulturministeriet, Case C-479/04, Judgment of 12 September 2006, [2006] ECR I-8089 4.022, 9.24, 24.028

Konstantinos Adeneler and Others v Ellinikos Organismos Galaktos (ELOG), Case C-212/04, Judgment of 4 July 2006, ECLI:EU:C:2006:443 22.017

Uradex SCRL v Union Professionnelle de la Radio et de la Télédistribution (RTD), Société Intercommunale pour la Diffusion de la Télévision, Case C-169/05, 1 June 2006, [2006] ECR I-04973 4.063

Mediakabel BV v Commissariaat voor de Media, Case C-89/04, 2 June 2005, [2005] ECR I-04891, ECLI:EU:C:2005:348 2.044, 20.018

SENA v Nos, Case C-245/00, Judgment of 6 February 2003, [2003] ECR I-1251, ECLI:EU:C:2003:68 2.017, 22.176

Yiadom, Case C-357/98, Judgment of 9 November 2000, [2000] ECRI-9265, ECLI:EU:C:2000:604 2.017

Foreniningen af Danske Videogramdistributører v Laserdisken, Case C-61/97, Judgment of 22 September 1998, [1998] ECR I-5171 9.24, 27.18

Silhouette International Schmied GmbH & Co. KG v Hartlauer Handelsgesellschaft mbH, Case C-355/96, Judgment of 16 July 1998, [1998] ECR I-04799 3.017

Parfums Christian Dior SA and Parfums Christian Dior BV v Evora BV, Case C-337/95, Judgment of 4 November 1997, [1998] 1 CMLR 737 22.004, 29.024

Radio Telefis Eireann (RTE) and Independent Television Publications Ltd. (ITP) v EC Commission, Joined Cases C-241/91 P and 242/91, Judgment 6 April 1995, [1995] 4 CMLR 718 22.004

General Court

International Confederation of Societies of Authors and Composers (CISAC) v European Commission, Judgment of 12 April 2013, Case T-442/08, ECLI:EU:T:2013:188 2.158

COUNCIL OF EUROPE

European Court of Human Rights

Neij and Sunde Kolmisoppi v Sweden, App. No. 40397/12, Judgment of 19 February 2013 1.039

Ashby Donald v France, App. No. 36769/08, Judgment of 10 January 2013 1.039

Balan v Moldova, App. No. 19247/03, Judgment of 29 January 2008 1.039

Anheuser-Busch Inc. v Portugal, Application No. 73049/01, Judgment of 11 January 2007 1.039

Dima v Romania, App. No. 58472/00 of 16 November 2006 1.039

Melnychuk v Ukraine, App. No. 28743/03, Judgment of 5 July 2005 1.039

NATIONAL COURTS

Austria

The following decisions can all be accessed online (in German language) at http://ris.bka.gv.at/Jus/:

Oberster Gerichtshof (OGH) (Supreme Court)

OGH, 24 October 2017, 4 Ob 121/17y 13.098

OGH, 21 February 2017, 4 Ob 62/16w 3.071

OGH, 17 December 2013, 4 Ob 138/13t 3.065

OGH, 11 May 2012, 4 Ob 85/12x 3.021

OGH, 20 September 2011, 4 Ob 105/11m –Thumbnails 3.008, 3.015

OGH, 9 August 2011, 4 Ob 101/11y 3.008

OGH, 23 February 2010, 4 Ob 208/09f 3.008, 3.015

OGH, 12 May 2009, 4 Ob 34/09t 3.021

OGH, 24 February 2009, 4 Ob 225/08d – Gerätekette 3.064

OGH, 26 August 2008, 4 Ob 111/08i 3.015

OGH, 21 November 2006, 4 Ob 178/06i 3.008, 3.015

OGH, 12 July 2005, 4 Ob 115/05y – Gericom 3.065

OGH, 21 December 2004, 4 Ob 252/04v 3.008

OGH, 12 June 2001, 4 Ob 127/01g 3.011

OGH, 23 May 2000, 4 Ob 115/04x – Schöne Oberösterreicherinnen 3.003

OGH, 17 March 1998, 4 Ob 80/98p – Figur auf einem Bein 3.031

OGH, 26 January 1993, 4 Ob 94/92 – Null-Nummer II 3.042

OGH, 20 November 1991, 1 Ob 28/91 – Bundesheer Ausbildungsfilme II 3.042

OGH, 27 January 1987, 4 Ob 393/86 3.013

Oberlandesgericht(Court of Appeal)

OLG Wien 12 April 2007, 5 R 193/06y – Media Sentry I 3.033

Belgium

Constitutional Court

Constitutional Court, 12 November 2009, Sony v Vandebeeck, no.182/2009, available on http://www.const-court.be  2.178, 4.079, 4.085

Constitutional Court 16 July 2009, Semu et al. v Flemish government et al., nr.127/2009, A&M, 2009, p. 526; available on http://www.const-court.be    4.051

Supreme Court

Supreme Court, SABAM v Proximus et al., 20 October 2017, C.16.0413.F/1 4.038

Cass. (Supreme Court), Telenet v SABAM et al., 30 September 2016, A&M, 2016, 339 4.037

Cass. (Supreme Court), X. v Facebook, 24 June 2015, R.G. N° P.15.0194.F, A&M, 2015, 277 4.029

Cass. (Supreme Court), Uradex v RTD, 14 June 2010, RDC, 2010, 807 4.065

Cass. (Supreme Court), 26 January 2006, A&M, 2006, 180, note H. Vanhees 4.028

Cass. (Supreme Court), 21 November 2003, A&M, 2004, 35, note H. Vanhees 4.028

Cass. (Supreme Court), Index v Biblo, 25 September 2003, A&M,2004, p. 29    4.066

Cass. (Supreme Court), 18 February 2000, A&M, 2000, 290 4.028

Cass. (Supreme Court), 8 October 1999, A&M, 2000, 289 4.028

Court of Appeal

Court of Appeal of Brussels, Hewlett-Packard v Reprobel, 12 May 2017, R.G. N° 2012/AR/3265, A&M, 2016, 427, par. 30 4.044

Court of Appeal of Brussels, SABAM v Proximus et al., 3 June 2016, RG N° 2015/AR/810 4.038

Court of Appeal of Brussels, Airfield v AGICOA, 9 June 2015, A&M, 2015, 296 4.035

Court of Appeal of Brussels, 13 January 2015, X. v Facebook, R.G. N° 2013/CO/499, A&M, 2015, 290 4.029

Court of Appeal of Ghent, 19 May 2014, A&M, 2014, 488–491 4.061

Court of Appeal of Antwerp, 26 September 2011, BAF v Proximus et al. (The Pirate Bay), A&M, 2012, 216–221 4.099, 4.101, 4.116, 4.117

Court of Appeal of Brussels, Copiepresse v Google, 5 May 2011, RG N°2007/AR/1730, IRDI, 2011, 265 4.020, 4.067

Court of Appeal of Brussels, SABAM v Scarlet, 28 January 2010, A&M, 2010/2 4.068

Court of Appeal of Brussels, Test achats v Sony Belgium et al., 9 September 2005, A&M, 2005, p. 301    2.207, 4.081, 4.088

Court of Appeal of Brussels, 21 March 2003, A&M, 2003, 366, note B. Vinçotte 4.101

Court of Appeal of Brussels, 9 September 2002, J & H v Universal Music, A&M, 2004, p. 329, note F. Brison    4.023

Court of Appeal of Liège, 8 December 1998, Belgian Anti-piracy Foundation v Laserdisc, A&M, 1999, p. 67    4.022

Court of Appeal of Brussels, SAJ et al. v Central Station, 28 October 1997, A&M, 1997, 383 4.098

Court of Appeal of Brussels, 11 April 1997, Horelec v Nintendo, A&M, 1997, p. 265    4.022

Court of Appeal of Antwerp, 24 June 1996, Belgian Anti-piracy Foundation v Opus I, A&M, 1997, 176 4.022

Court of Appeal of Brussels, 22 May 1996, Copperhead v IFPI Belgium, A&M, 1997,178 4.022

Other courts

Commercial Court of Brussels, A/18/00217, 30 March 2018, ASBL Belgian Entertainment Association v SCRL Societe Intercommunale Pour La Diffusion De La Television – Intercommunale MaatschappijVoor De Verbreiding Van Televisie 2.220

Court of First Instance of Brussels (Pres.), SABAM v Proximus et al., 13 March 2015, RG N° 13/12839/A 4.038

Commercial Court of Antwerp (Pres.), VRT et al. v Right Brain, 4 November 2014, A&M, 2015, 80 4.039, 4.116

Court of First Instance of Brussels (Pres.), 9 May 2013, BAF v DNS Belgium, A&M, 2013, 499–508 4.116

Court of First Instance of Brussels (Pres.), 14 January 2008, RG N° 07/15931/A 4.118

President of the Court of First Instance of Brussels, SABAM v Scarlet (Tiscali), 29 June 2007, A&M, 2007, p. 476    4.068, 4.099

President of the Court of First Instance of Brussels, Copiepresse v Google, 13 February 2007, A&M, 2007, 107, note D.Voorhoof 4.009, 4.049, 4.057

President of the Court of First Instance of Brussels, SABAM v Scarlet (Tiscali), 26 November 2004, A&M, 2005, 46 4.099, 4.110

President of the Court of First Instance of Brussels, SAJ et al. v Central Station, 16 October 1996, A&M, 1996, 426 4.098

Bulgaria

Supreme Court

Decision No. 112 of 2 August 2017 on commercial case No.1771/2016 of Supreme Cassation Court, First Commercial panel 5.37

Interpretative Decision No.1 of 11 May 2012 on case No.1/2011 of the Supreme Cassation Court, Commercial College 5.34

Supreme Cassation Court –Commercial College: Interpretative Decision No. 1 of 15 June 2009 on case No. 1/2008 5.34

Other courts

Gotze Delchev District Court: Decision No.1728 of 6 June 2014 on administrative case No. 172/2014 5.55

Croatia

Supreme Misdemeanour Court of The Republic of Croatia

Gž-1244/15 6.21

Gž-2226/2013 6.21

Gž-4849/12 6.21

Gž-4160/11 6.21

Pž-694/82 of 19 October 1982 6.07

High Commercial Court of The Republic of Croatia

Pž-7647/02–4 6.21

Pž-1279/11–3 6.22

Pž-934/10 of 28 May 2012 6.18

Pž-3215/94 of l3 February 1996 6.22

Information Officer

Decision No. UP/II-008–07/15–01/319 of 15 March 2017 6.79

Cyprus

Blade Enterprises Ltd. v Cyprus Organisation of Agricultural Payments, Case No. 550/2012 of 27 March 2015 7.18

Diavlos Epiheiriseis Pliroforisis Ltd.v Police (Criminal Appeal No. 199/2012) and Michalis Papaevagorou v Police (Criminal Appeal 200/2012), dated 7 July 2014 7.22

Director of Limassol Police v 1. Diavlos Epiheiriseis Pliroforisis Ltd.2. Michalis Papaevagorou (Case no. 26225/2009) dated 12 September 2012 7.22

Czech Republic

Constitutional Court

Ruling of the Constitutional Court of the Czech Republic no. II. ÚS 2186/14 of 13 January 2015, INTERGRAM, nezávisléspolečnosti výkonných umělcůa výrobcůzvukových a zvukově-obrazových záznamů, z. s. v JiříTůma 8.25

Ruling of the Constitutional Court of theCzech Republic no. II. ÚS 3076/13 of 15 April 2014 (Velo CZ, s.r.o. v Ochrannáasociace zvukařů–autorů [CMO for Sound Engineers and Authors]) 8.29

Ruling of the Constitutional Court of the Czech Republic no. IV. ÚS 146/04 of 4 April 2005 8.41

Ruling of the Constitutional Court of the Czech Republic no. IV. ÚS 606/03 of19 April 2004 8.41

Supreme Court

Ruling of the Supreme Court of the Czech Republic from 14 October 2015, file no. 31 Cdo 3093/2013 8.18, 8.23

Ruling of the Supreme Court of the Czech Republic from 28 March 2013, file no.30 Cdo 3093/2012 8.17

Ruling of the Supreme Court of the Czech Republic from 31 January 2013, file no.30 Cdo 3056/2012 8.17

Ruling of the Supreme Court of the Czech Republic from 30 September 2004, file no. 4 Tz 124/2004 8.36

Denmark

Supreme Court

Judgment of 4 September 2017 9.43

Judgment in Ugeskrift for Retsvaesen 2014, p. 2442    9.44

Judgment in Ugeskrift for Retsvaesen 2013, p. 1782    9.07, 9.32

Decision of 27 May 2010, Ugeskrift for Retsvaesen 2010, p. 2221    9.69

Judgment in Ugeskrift for Retsvaesen 2007 (26 March 2007), p. 1581    9.13

Judgment in Ugeskrift for Retsvaesen 2006, p. 1474    9.67

Judgment in Ugeskrift for Retsvaesen 2004, p. 2134    9.13

Judgment in Ugeskrift for Retsvaesen 2002, p. 649    9.13

Judgment of 10 April 2002, Ugeskrift for Retsvaesen 2003, p. 212    9.13

Judgment in Ugeskrift for Retsvaesen 2001, p. 1572    9.18

Judgment of 8 September 1999, Ugeskrift for Retsvaesen 1999, p. 2011    9.13

Judgment of 6 March 1997, Ugeskrift for Retsvaesen 1997, p. 691    9.06

Other courts

Decision of Vestre Landsret 11 January 2016 (Laserdisken IV). 9.23

Decision Ugeskrift for Retsvaesen 2016, p. 2731    9.13

Eastern High Court, Ugeskrift for Retsvaesen 2010, p. 2221    9.667

Eastern High Court, Judgment of 4 December 2001, Ugeskrift for Retsvaesen 2002, p. 649    9.13

Western High Court, Judgment of 20 April 2001, Ugeskrift for Retsvaesen 2001, p. 1572    9.18

Estonia

Estonian Supreme Court, RK otsus 3–2-1–50–13 Tartu, 29.mai 2013.a) 10.49

Finland

Supreme Court

Decision KKO 2017:85 11.50

Judgment KKO 2015:17 11.50

Judgment KKO 2010:48 11.51

Judgment KKO 2010:47 11.51

Judgment KKO 2003:88 11.37

Judgment KKO 1998:155 11.05

Market Court Decisions

Market Court decision, 20 March 2018, decision number 167/18 11.46

Market Court decision, 7 December 2017, decision number 752/17 11.47

Market Court decision, 14 June 2017, decision number 351/17 11.47

Market Court decision, 12 June 2017, decision number 333/17 11.46

Market Court decision, 29 April 2016, decision number 243/16 11.44

Other courts

Helsinki Court of Appeal, 5 March 2013, judgment number 716, Teosto v Archtecho Oy and Arctecho OÜ 11.17

Helsinki Court of Appeal, 12 February 2013, decision number 411, Musiikkituottajat –IFPI Finland ry representing EMI Finland Oy Ab and others v TeliaSonera Finland Oyj 11.42

Helsinki Court of Appeal, 8 February 2013, decision number 383, Musiikkituottajat –IFPI Finland ry representing EMI Finland Oy and others v DNA Oy.Helsinki Court of Appeal, 15 June 2012, decision number 1687, Musiikkituottajat –IFPI Finland ry representing EMI Finland Oy AB and others v Elisa Oyj 11.42

Helsinki Court of Appeal, 9 June 2010, judgment number1607, Prosecutor v Sihvo and Kortelainen 2.193, 11.33

Helsinki Court of Appeal, 22 May 2008, judgment number1427, Prosecutor v Rauhala 2.193, 11.33

Helsinki Court of Appeal, 2 June 2005, decision number1858, Teosto and others v TeliaSonera Finland Oyj (HelsinkiDistrictCourt, 21 December 2004, number 31693) 11.40

France

Conseil D’Etat (State Council)

Conseil d’Etat, 10e et 9e sous-sections réunies, 16 July 2008, No.301843 2.202, 12.44

Conseil d’Etat, 10e et 9e sous-sections réunies, 11 July 2008, No. 298779 2.095

Cour de Cassation (Supreme Court)

Cass civ. I, 6 September 2017, ECLI:FR:CCASS:2017:C100928–allostreaming 13.107

Cass. civ. I, 6 July 2017, ECLI:FR:CCASS:2017:C100909–allostreaming 13.107

Cass. civ. I, 14 January 2010, Com. com. électr. 2010, comm. no. 22, note Caron 12.14

Cass. civ. I, 19 June 2008, [2008] RIDA 217, p. 299, Com. com. électr. 2008, comm. no. 102, note Caron    12.21

Cass. crim., 30 May 2006, Min. Publ. et autres v Aurélien D. [2006] RIDA 210, p. 327    2.095, 12.12

Cass. civ. I, 28 February 2006 (Studio Canal v Perquin), PI 2006, no. 19, 79, note Lucas; JCP G. 2006, II, 10084, note Lucas; Com. com. électr. 2006, comm. no. 56, note Caron; translated into English in [2006] IIC 37, p. 760    2.089, 2.207, 3.090, 12.21, 30.48

Cass. civ. I, 27 April 2004, PI July 2004, no. 12, 770, obs. Lucas, Com. com. électr.2004, comm. no. 84, note Caron 12.15

Cass. crim., 16 December 2003, JCP 2004, IV, 1237; Com. com. électr.2004, comm. no. 26, note Caron 12.16

Cass. civ. I, 6 April 1994 (C.N.N. v Novotel), JCP 1994, II, 22273, note Galloux, D. 1994, 450, note Gautier, [1994] RIDA 161, p. 367, note Kéréver    12.14

Cass. civ., 28 April 1947, D. 1948, 390, note Desbois 12.14

Cass. civ., 2 January 1946, D. 1946, 133 12.14

Cour D’Appel (Court of Appeal)

Cour d’Appel Paris, 15 March 2016, allostreaming 12.47

Cour d’Appel Paris, 4e ch., 7 March 2008 (3 cases), PI October 2008, no. 29, 423, obs. A. Lucas 12.14

Cour d’Appel d’Aix en Provence (5ème chambre), Judgment of 5 September 2007, Ministère public/Aurélien D. [2007] RIDA, 214, pp. 346–352    2.095, 12.12

Cour d’Appel Paris, 4e ch. B, 29 June 2007, Com. com. électr. 2007, comm. no. 131, note Caron 12.15

Cour d’Appel Paris, 4e ch., 4 April 2007, [2007] RIDA 213, p. 379    12.21

Cour d’Appel Versailles, 15 April 2005, PI July 2005, no. 16, 340, note Lucas and Sirinelli 12.21

Cour d’Appel Paris, 13 October 1999: PIBD 2000, 704, III, 424 12.11

Cour d’Appel Paris, 29 September 1999, [2000] RIDA 185, 462 12.11

Cour d’Appel Paris,1re ch., 20 September 1995, [1996] RIDA 167, 277 12.14

Other courts (Tribunal de Grande Instance (TGI), Tribunal de Commerce)

TGI Paris, 25 May 2018, 18/03028, Federation National des Distributors et autres v S.A. Orange et autres 2.220

TGI Paris, 4 December 2014 – The Pirate Bay 12.47

TGI Paris, 28 November 2013 – allostreaming 12.47

TGI Paris, réf., 6 August 2008, [2008] RIDA 217, p. 343    12.20

TGI Paris, 11 September 2007, [2007] RIDA 214, 368 12.14

TGI Paris, 30 June 2000: Com. comm. électr. January 2001, comm. n°3, obs. C. Caron 12.11

TGI Paris, 3 September 1999, SCPP v Jean-Louis et Benoît T., available on http.legalis.net  12.46

TGI Paris, 14 August 1996, [1997] RIDA 171, 253, obs. A. Kéréver and at361, note C. Caron 12.11

HADOPI (High Authority for the diffusion of works and the protection of works on the Internet)

Opinion No. 2014–1 2.202

Opinion No. 2013–2 2.202

Germany

Federal Constitutional Court (Bundesverfassungsericht–BVERFG)

BVerfG, Case 1 BvR 1585/13 of 31 May 2016, GRUR 2016, 690 13.012

BVerfG, Case 1 BvR 1248/11 of 15 December 2011, GRUR 2012, 390 13.084

BVerfG, Case1 BvR 506/09 of 21 December 2010, GRUR 2011, 225 13.065

BVerfG, Case 1 BvR 2760/08 of 21 December 2010, GRUR 2011, 223 13.065

BVerfG, Case 1 BvR 2742/08 of 21 December 2010, ZUM 2011, 313 13.065

BVerfG, Cases1 BvR 1631/08 of 30 August 2010, GRUR 2010, 999 13.064

BVerfG, Case1 BvR 1936/05 of 3 January 2007, GRUR 2007, 1064 13.084

BVerfG, Case1 BvR 2182/04 of 25 July 2005, GRUR 2005, 1032 13.076

BVerfG, Case 1 BvR 3479/08 of 7 October 1999, GRUR 2010, 56 13.044

Federal Supreme Court (Bundesgerichtshof – BGH)

Dead Island, BGH, Case I ZR 64/17, 26 July 2018, GRUR 2018, 1044 13.101

Vorschaubilder III, BGH, Case I ZR 11/16, 21 September 2017, NJW 2018, 772 13.022, 13.032

Reformistischer Aufbruch, BGH, I ZR 228/15, 27 July 2017, GRUR 2017, 1027 13.072

Afghanistan Papiere, BGH, Case I ZR 139/15, 1 June 2017, GRUR 2017, 901 13.072, 13.073

Metall auf Metall III, BGH, Case I ZR 115/16, 1 June 2017, GRUR 2017, 895 13.012, 13.070, 13.072, 13.073

PC mit Festplatte I, BGH, Case I ZR 39/15, 16 March 2017, GRUR 2017, 702 13.064

PC mit Festplatte II, BGH, Case I ZR 42/15, 16 March 2017, GRUR 2017, 716 13.064

Gesamtvertrag PCs, BGH, Case I ZR 36/15, 16 March 2017, GRUR 2017, 694 13.064

Externe Festplatten, BGH, Case I ZR 35/15, 16 March 2017, GRUR 2017, 684 13.064

East Side Gallery, BGH, Case I ZR 242/15, 19 January 2017, GRUR 2017, 390 13.011

World of Warcraft I, BGH, Case I ZR 25/15, 6 October 2016, GRUR 2017, 266 13.014, 13.051

‘auf fett getrimmt’, BGH, Case I ZR 9/15, 28 July 2016, GRUR 2016, 1157 13.048

Musik-Handy, BGH, Case I ZR 255/14, 21 July 2016, GRUR 2017, 172 13.064

Gesamtvertrag Speichermedien, BGH, Case I ZR 212/14, 21 July 2016, GRUR 2017, 161 13.064

Verlegeranteil, BGH, Case I ZR 198/13, 21 April 2016, GRUR 2016, 596 13.063

Hotel Königshof, BGH, Case I ZR 21/14, 17 December 2015, GRUR 2016, 697 13.022, 13.023, 13.027

Störerhaftung des Access Providers, BGH, Case I ZR 174/14, 26 November 2015, GRUR 2016, 268 13.095

3dl.am, BGH, Case I ZR 3/14, 26 November 2015, MMR 2016, 188 13.095, 13.099

Gesamvertrag Unterhaltungselektronik, BGH, Case I ZR 151/13, 19 November 2015, GRUR 2016, 792 13.064

Ramses, BGH, Case I ZR 228/14, 17 September 2015, GRUR 2016, 71 13.028

Die Realität II, BGH, Case I ZR 46/12, 9 July 2015, GRUR 2016, 671 13.022, 13.023, 13.029, 13.031, 13.081

Hintergrundmusik in Zahnarztpraxen, BGH, Case I ZR 14/14, 18 June 2015, GRUR 2016, 278 13.027

Elektronische Leseplätze II, Case I ZR 69/11, 16 April 2015, GRUR 2015, 1101 13.054

Green-IT, BGH, Case I ZR 4/14, 19 March 2015, GRUR 2015, 1108 13.038

UsedSoft III, BGH, Case I ZR 8/13, 11 December 2014, GRUR 2015, 772 13.038, 13.039

Videospiel-Konsolen II, BGH, Case I ZR 124/11, 27 November 2014, GRUR 2015, 672 13.077, 13.087

Vergütungspflicht Drucker und PCs, BGH, Case I ZR 29/11, 3 July 2014 13.066

Drucker und Plotter III, BGH, Case I ZR 28/11, 3 July 2014, GRUR 2014, 979 13.064, 13.067

BGH, Case I ZR 162/10, Case I ZR 29/11, 3 July 2014 13.067

PC III, BGH, GRUR 2014, 984 13.067

UsedSoft II, BGH, Case I ZR 129/08, 17 July 2013, GRUR 2014, 264 13.037, 13.039

Internet-Videorecorder II, BGH, Case I ZR 153/11, 11 April 2013 13.048

Metall auf Metall II, BGH, Case I ZR 182/11, 13 December 2012, GRUR 2013, 614 13.012

Digitales Druckzentrum, BGH, Case I ZR, 43/11, 9 February 2012, GRUR 2012, 1017 13.064

PC als Bild-und Tonaufzeichnungsgerät, BGH, Case I ZR 59/10, 30 November 2011, GRUR 2012, 705 13.064

Vorschaubilder II, BGH, Case I ZR 140/10, 19 October 2011, GRUR 2012, 602 13.011

PC II, BGH, Case I ZR 30/11, 21 July 2011, GRUR 2011, 1012 13.066

Drucker und Plotter II, BGH, Case I ZR 28/11, 21 July 2011, GRUR 2011, 1007 13.066

BGH, Case I ZR 162/10, 21 July 2011, ZUM 2011,729 13.066

Usedsoft, BGH, Case I ZR 129/08, 3 February 2011, GRUR 2011, 418 13.039, 13.037

Any DVD, BGH, Case I ZR 191/08, 14 October 2010, GRUR 2011, 513 13.083

BGH, Case III ZR 140/09, 24 June 2010, GRUR 2010, 924 13.067

Vorschaubilder, BGH, Case I ZR 69/08, 29 April 2010, GRUR 2010, 628 13.011, 13.051, 13.080

Session-ID, BGH, Case I ZR 39/08, 29 April 2010, GRUR 2011, 56 13.030, 13.079, 13.080, 13.081

Half Life 2, BGH, Case I ZR 178/08, 11 February 2010, GRUR 2010, 822 13.035

Marions Kochbuch, BGH, Case I ZR 166/07, 12 November 2009, GRUR 2010, 616 13.011

Scannertarif, BGH, Case I ZR 168/06, 29 October 2009, GRUR 2010, 57 13.064

Internet-Videorekorder, BGH, Case I ZR 216/06, 22 April 2009, GRUR 2009, 845 13.047

Metall auf Metall, BGH Case I ZR 112/06, 20 November 2008, GRUR 2009, 403 13.012

PC, BGH, Case I ZR 18/06, 2 October 2008, GRUR 2009, 53 13.064

Clone-CD, BGH, Case I ZR 219/05, 17 July 2008, GRUR 2008, 996 13.082

Internetversteigerung III, BGH, Case I ZR 73/05, 30 April 2008, GRUR 2008, 702 13.094

Multifunktionsgeräte, BGH, Case I ZR 131/05, 30 January 2008, GRUR 2008, 786 13.064

Drucker und Plotter, BGH, Case I ZR 94/05, 6 December 2007, GRUR 2008, 245 13.064

Internetversteigerung II, BGH, Case I ZR 35/04, 19 April 2007, GRUR 2007, 708 13.094

Marktstudien, BGH, I ZR 1/02, Case 21 April 2004, GRUR 2005, 940 13.036

Internetversteigerung I, BGH, Case I ZR 304/01, 11 March 2004, GRUR 2004, 860 13.094

Paperboy, BGH, Case I ZR 259/00, 17 July 2003, GRUR 2003, 958 13.011, 13.029, 13.030, 13.079

Gies-Adler, BGH, Case I ZR 117/00, 20 March 2003, GRUR 2003, 956 13.069

OEM-Version, BGH, Case I ZR 244/97, 6 July 2000, GRUR 2001, 153 13.040

Parfumflakon, BGH, Case I ZR 256/97, 4 May 2000, GRUR 2001, 51 13.041

Kopienversanddienst, BGH. Judgment of 25 February 1999, BGHZ 141, 13 13.089

Telefaxgeräte, BGH, Case I ZR 208/96, 28 January 1999, GRUR 1999, 928 13.064

Readerprinter, BGH,Case I ZR 34/91, 28 January 1993, GRUR 1993, 553; [1995] IIC 434 13.064

Betriebssystem, BGH, Case I ZR 139/89,4 October 1990, GRUR 1991, 449 13.036, 13.051

Vervielfältigungsstücke, BGH, Case I ZR 111/76,14 April 1978, GRUR 1978, 474 3.042

Disney Parody, BGH, Case I ZR 77/69, 26 March 1971, NJW 1971, 2169 13.069

Higher regional courts (Oberlandesgericht–OLG, Kammergericht (KG) in the case of Berlin)

OLG München, 29 U 732/18, GRUR 2018, 1050 13.100

Exif Dateien, OLG Köln, Case I-6 U 105/16, 20 January 2017, GRUR-RR 2017, 212 13.091

Die Realität III, OLG München, Case 6 U 1092/11, 25 August 2016, GRUR 2016, 1300 13.031

Ebooks, OLG Hamburg, Case 10 U 5/11, 24 March 2015, ZUM 2015, 503 13.039

Handel mit Gebrauchtsoftware, OLG München, Case 6 U 2759/07, 2 March 2015, ZUM 2015, 818.

Elektronische Leseplätze II, GRUR 2015, 1101 13.054

Ebooks, OLG Hamburg, Case 10 U 5/11, 4 December 2014, GRUR-RR 2015, 361 13.039

Audiobooks, OLG Hamm, Case I-22-U 60/13, 15 May 2014, ZUM 2014, 715 13.039

SaveTV, OLG München, Case 29 U 3989/12, 19 September 2013, ZUM 2014, 813 13.048

Audiobook Download Service, OLG Stuttgart, 3 November 2011, ZUM 2012, 811 13.039

Staytuned III, OLG Hamburg, Case 5 U 154/07, 11 February 2009, ZUM 2009, 414 1.083, 13.019, 13.033

UsedSoft OLG München, Case 6 U 2759/07, 3 July 2008, ZUM 2009, 70 13.037

Any DVD, OLG München, Case 29 U 2887/05, 28 July 2005, GRUR-RR 2005, 372 13.083

Staytuned, OLG Hamburg, Case 5 U 176/04, 7 July 2005, ZUM 2005, 749 13.034

KG, Case 5 U 98/02, 30 April 2004, GRUR-RR 2004, 228 13.052

Regional courts (Landgericht–LG)

LG München I, 1 February 2018, Case ref. 7 O 17752/17, MMR 2018, 322 13.100

LG Frankfurt/Main, Case 2–03 O 494/14, 9 February 2018 (appealed) 1.081

LG Hamburg, Case 310 O 117/17, 13 June 2017, K&R 2017, 811 13.032

LG Hamburg, Case 310 O 402/16, 18 November 2016, GRUR-RR 2017, 216 13.032

LG Hamburg, Case 308 O 48/15, 3 February 2016 13.091

LG München I, Case 7 O 10502/12, 26 July 2012, K&R 2012, 835 2.193

Zattoo, LG Hamburg, Case 308 O 660/08, 8 April 2009, ZUM 2009, 582 13.024

LG Frankfurt am Main, Case 2–06 O 288/06, 31 May 2006, MMR 2006, 766 13.078

DVD-Kopierschutz, LG Munich, Case 21 O 3220/05, 7 March 2005, GRUR-RR 2005, 214 13.083

Greece

Supreme Court

Decision 152/2005 of the Supreme Court, DiMEE (2005), 413 14.14

Courts of Appeal

Decision 8427/2006 of the Court of Appeals of Athens, DiMEE (2001), 421 14.26

Decision 5866/2003 of the Court of Appeals of Athens, DEE (2003), 1330 14.14

Decision 701/2003 of the Court of Appeals of Piraeus, PeirN., (2003), 423 14.14

Decision 931/2000 of the Court of Appeals of Athens, Hronika Idiotikou Dikaiou (2001), 170 14.14

Decision 7458/1999 of the Court of Appeals of Athens, EpiskED (2000), 749 14.13

Other courts

Decision 3230/2017 of the Multi-member Court of First Instance 14.68

Decision 3230/2017 (Huawei decision) of the Multi-member Chamber of the Court of First Instance of Athens 14.68

Decision 10452/2015 of the Single Member First Instance Court of Athens 14.68

Decision 13478/2014 of the Single Member First Instance Court of Athens 14.68

Decision 4658/2012 of the Single Member First Instance Court of Athens 14.68

Decision 633/2008 of the Single Member First Instance Court of Athens, Nomika Vima (2008), 896 14.22

Decision 24610/2004 of the Single Member First Instance Court of Athens, Hronika Idiotikou Dikaiou (2006), 929 14.30, 14.50

Decision 2122/2004 of the Single Member First Instance Court of Athens, Hronika Idiotikou Dikaiou (2005), 101 14.21

Decision 3431/2002 of the Single Member First Instance Court of Athens, Hronika Idiotikou Dikaiou (2003), 652 14.20

Decision 11923/1998 of the Single Member First Instance Court of Athens, EEmpD (1999), 153 14.13

Hungary

Supreme Court and Kuria (the name of the court under the 2011 Constitution)

BH 1984/286 15.024

BH 1941/147 15.024

7/2014 Uniformity decision 15.096

Reports (Official Opinions) of the Copyright Experts Council

SzJSzT 13/2010 15.019

SzJSzT 07/2008 15.026

SzJSzT 31/2007 15.027

SzJSzT 17/2006 15.036, 15.060

SzJSzT 15/2004 15.031

Ireland

Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp.and Ors v Eircom Ltd.t/a Eir & Ors [2018] IEHC 54 16.116

Sony Music Entertainment Ltd.and Ors v UPC Communications Ireland Ltd. [2016] IECA 231 16.109

Sony Music Entertainment (Ireland) Ltd.and Ors v UPC Communications Ltd. [2015] IEHC 317 16.103

EMI Records and Ors v Eircom Ltd [2010] IECH 108 16.095

EMI Records (Ireland) Ltd., Sony BMG Music Entertainment (Ireland) Ltd., Universal Music (Ireland) Ltd. and Warner Music (Ireland) Ltd. v Eircom Ltd. and BT Communications (Ireland) Ltd. [2005] IEHC 233 16.092

Italy

Constitutional Court (Corte Costituzionale)

Corte Costituzionale, Decision No. 215/1986 17.010

Supreme Court (Corte Di Cassazione)

Corte di Cassazione, 5 July 2017, No. 16601/2017 17.115

Corte di Cassazione, 8 February 2016, No. 2468/16 17.020

Corte di Cassazione, 10 May 2010, No. 11300 17.010

Corte di Cassazione, 20 September 2006, No. 20410 17.048

Corte di Cassazione, 24 September 1998, No. 388/99 17.010, 17.041

Corte di Cassazione, 7 March 1997, No. 2089 17.034, 17.041

Corte di Cassazione, 15 January 1992, No. 412 17.052

Corte di Cassazione, 20 November 1982, No. 751 17.041

Corte di Cassazione, 21 February 1969, No. 587 17.010

Other courts

AGCom, Decision No. 490/18 of 16 October 2018 17.121

Tribunal of Milan, Decision of 6 November 2016 17.134

AGCom, Decision of 12 December 2013, 680/13/CONS 17.121

Tribunal of Milan, Decision of 13 July 2011, Rivista di Diritto Industriale–2011 II p. 347    17.037

Tribunal of Milan, 10 July 2008 –Duranti 2.207

Court of Rome, 26 April 2006 17.074

Court of Milan, 12 June 2006 17.074

Lithuania

Supreme Court

Case e3K-3–513–916/2016, UAB ‘15 min’ v UAB ‘Lrytas’, Decision of 14 December 2016 19.08

Case 3K-3–85–378/2016, Kino industrijos asociacija v UAB EVP International, Decision of 10 March 2016 19.63

Case 3K-3–534–916/2015, LATGA v UAB ‘MASADA’, Decision of 16 October 2015 19.12, 19.17

Case 3K-3–302/2009, Judgment of 7 July 2009, Hesona, UAB v LATGA-A (Agency of Lithuanian Authors’ Collective Rights Management Association) 19.12, 19.17

Case 3K-3–4/2008, Judgment of 3 March 2008, Trajektorija, UAB v LATGA-A (Agency of Lithuanian Authors’ Collective Rights Management Association) 19.12, 19.17, 19.37

Other courts

Vilnius District Court, Decision of 20 November 2017, LATGA v internet service providers ‘Bitė Lietuva’, ‘Telecentras’, ‘Init’, ‘Cgates’, ‘Balticum TV’, ‘Splius’, ‘Penkiųkontinentųkomunikacijųcentras’ir ‘Telia Lietuva’, not yet published 19.62

Vilnius District Court, Decision of 12 October 2017 case No. e2A-179–881/2017 (confirming Mediashop, UAB v LATGA (Lithuanian Authors’ Collective Rights Management Association), Case No. e2–7480–861/2016) 19.45

Vilnius District Court, Decision of 10 December 2012 in civ. case No. 2–742–262/2012, Microsoft Korporacija v UAB N5 and K.E. 19.62

Kaunas District Court, Judgment of 27 December 2006 19.37

Kaunas Circuit Court, Judgment of 6 September 2006 19.37

Luxembourg

Superior Court of Justice

Cour supérieure de Justice, 21 November 2012, No 38011 20.129

Court of Appeal (Cour D’Appel)

Kutter v Krippler, Cour d'appel, 4 June 1973, Min. Pub., Pas. XXII, p. 334    20.150

Nimax v Barthel et von Spée, Cour d'appel, 28 February 1913, Pas. VIII, p. 439    20.061

Other courts

Tribunal d’arrondissement Luxembourg, 16 March 2016, Case 64/2016 20.013, 20.017, 20.131

Tribunal d’arrondissement Luxembourg, 21 March 2014, Ref. No. 153803 20.019

Tribunal d’arrondissement Luxembourg, 11 May 2011, Case 135.780 20.013, 20.017, 20.131

Tribunal d'arrondissement Luxembourg, 4 December 2007, No. 107721 20.140

Krack v Guzman Orjuela, Tribunal d'arrondissement Luxembourg, Ref.828/2006, 30 November 2006, No.104719 20.017

Tribunal d'arrondissement Luxembourg, 24 June 2005, No.86844 and 89286 20.128, 20.140

Malta

Court of Appeal

Av. Henri Mizzi noe. v Telestarr Ltd., Court of Appeal, 30 September 2016, first instance: First Hall Civil Court, 20 April 2012 21.23

The Performing Right Society Ltd. v One Productions Ltd., Court of Appeal, 27 March 2015 21.57

Dr.Louis Cassar noe. v NCT International Trading Ltd., Court of Appeal, 3 December 2010 21.12

General Soft Drinks Company v Portanier Bros. Ltd., Court of Appeal, 31 July 2003 21.14

First Hall Civil Court

Alexander Bezzina et. v Gasan Enterprises, First Hall Civil Court, 22 February 2017 21.02

Maestro Joseph Gatt v Lawrence Scicluna, First Hall Civil Court, 27 October 2016 21.13

Performing Right Society Limited ta’ Londra (Numru ta’ Registrazzjoni 134396) raprezentata mill-agent u mandatrici taghha Dingli Co. International Ltd. v. Tal-Lira 2 Ltd., First Hall Civil Court, 8 October 2015 21.28

Martin Scerri v John Zammit, First Hall Civil Court, 5 October 2015 21.11

Saviour Mallia v MK Leisure, First Hall Civil Court, 4 July 2013 21.02

Events Services (P1019) and Alan Cutajar v Public Broadcasting Ltd.and SandroMicallef, First Hall Civil Court, 16 April 2012 21.16

Jon David Ltd. v Bortex Clothing Industry Co. Ltd.et., First Hall Civil Court, 30 November 2011 21.52

Ronald Camilleri et v Noel Grima noe, First Hall Civil Court, 20 October 2011 21.52

Paul Saliba v Anthony Mifsud, First Hall Civil Court, 19 April 2011 21.32

Court of Magistrates

Il-Pulizija v Victoria Vassallo, Court of Magistrates (Criminal Judicature) 13 March 2013 21.15

The Netherlands

Hoge Raad (Supreme Court)

Judgment of 6 October 2017, (2017) AMIno. 16 pp. 206–212 note J.R. Spauwen    22.113

Brein v Ziggo and XS4ALL, 13 November 2015, ECLI:NL:HR:2015:3307; (2018) BIE no. 29 p. 260–73 note A.A. Quaedvlieg    22.073, 22.173

GS Media v Sanoma, 3 April 2015, (2015) NJ 183 22.069

NORMA v NL Kabel, 28 March 2014, (2015) NJ no. 365 note P.B. Hugenholtz; (2014) AMI 2014 p. 96–100    22.040

S&S Import en Export/Esschert Design (‘Fire stoves’), 25 October 2013, (2014) IER no. 6 pp. 48–55 note P.G.F.A. Geerts; (2014) AMI no 6 pp. 65–67; ECLI:NL:HR:2013:1036    22.033

NORMA c.s. v Staat, Supreme Court of the Netherlands, 7 March 2013, (2016) NJ 184, note P.B. Hugenholtz 22.099, 22.114

ACI Adam v Thuiskopie, 21 September 2012, (2012) AMI, p. 272; (2013) IER no. 14, pp. 125–50, note H.M.H. Speyart; IEF 11775    22.017, 22.109

BUMA v Chellomedia, 19 June 2009, LJN: BH7602; AMI 2010, pp. 12–18, note PB Hugenholtz; IER 2010, nr 24 p. 195, note Madeleine de Cock Buning Ladbrokes, 18 February 2005, NJ 2005, 404    22.038

BUMA v KaZaA, 19 December 2003, AMI2004, nr 1 pp. 9–25, note P.B.Hugenholtz; (2009) NJ 548 note Hugenholtz at 551; (2004) Computerrecht nr. 23, p. 140–43, note H. Wefers Bettink; [2004] EIPR N-49    22.050

Stichting Reprorecht v NBLC en Noord-Brabant, 10 November 1995, NJ 1996, 177; IER 1996, p. 28, (critical) note PB Hugenholtz; Informatierecht AMI 1996, nr. 3, p 55–56, (critical) note AA Quaedvlieg    22.121

Dior v Evora, 20 October 1995, NJ 1996, 682 note Spoor; Ars Aequi 1997, 640 note H. Cohen Jehoram; IER 1995, 223; AMI 1996, 51 22.004

Damave v Trouw, 26 June 1992, NJ1992, 205, note DWF Verkade; IER1992, p. 154, note AA Quaedvlieg    22.123, 22.156

Malmberg v Beeldrecht (Zienderogen Kunst), 22 June 1990, NJ1991, 268, note JH Spoor; AMI 1990, pp. 202–205 note EJ Dommering; Ars Aequi 1991, p. 672 note H Cohen Jehoram    22.155

Suske & Wiske, 13 April 1984, NJ 1984, 524 note Wichers Hoeth; Ars Aequi 1984, 565 note H Cohen Jehoram 22.140

Judgment of 14 January 1983, (1984) NJ 696 22.052

Lexington, 3 January 1964, NJ 1964, 445 22.081

BUMA v De Vries, 8 March 1957, (1957) NJ 271 22.052

Court of Appeal

MyP2P v Football Leagues, Court of Appeal of Den Bosch, 17 October 2017, (2017) IER no. 3, pp. 9–16 note S.C. Van Velze    22.071

Moulinsart v Hergé Genootschap, Court of Appeal The Hague, 27 October 2015, (2016) AMI p. 23–24, note M. de Zwaan; IEF 15364    22.126

MyP2P v Football Leagues, Court of Appeal of Den Bosch, 30 June 2015, (2015) IER no. 56, pp. 399–407 note PGFA Geerts    22.071

NUV v Tom Kabinet, Court of Appeal Amsterdam, 20 January 2015, (2015) AMI pp. 88–90, note M. Senftleben; (2015) IER no. 13 p. 108–113; IE Forum 14569    22.036

NSE v Brein (‘Usenet’), Court of Appeal of Amsterdam, 19 August 2014, (2015) Mediaforumno. 2 p. 33–40 note Tineke van der Bunt    22.174

Brein v Ziggo, Court of Appeal of Amsterdam, 28 January 2014, (2014) Mediaforumno. 9 p. 72–80 note Kingma    22.173

GS Media v Sanoma, Court of Appeal of Amsterdam, 19 November 2013, (2014) AMI pp. 39–40    22.069

Math Teacher v Noordhoff and Thieme, Court of Appeal of Amsterdam,15 January 2013, (2013) IER no. 39 pp. 333–38, note J.M.B Seignette    22.056

Norma v Thuiskopie, Court of Appeal of The Hague, 27 March 2012, (2012) Mediaforum no. 18 pp. 217–24 note P. Kreijger    22.099

ACI Adam, Imation and other importers and producers of blank recording media v Thuiskopie and SONT, Court of Appeal of The Hague, 15 November 2010, (2011) IER no. 28, pp. 917–210, note Koelman, (2011) Computerrechtp. 69; LJN: BO3982, B9217    22.056, 22.096, 22.106, 22.163, 22.169

FTD v Eyeworks (‘Usenet’ or ‘Komt een vrouw bij de dokter’), Court of Appeal of The Hague, 15 November 2010, LJN: BO3980; B99218 22.059, 22.106, 22.163

X v Brein (‘Share Connector’), Court of Appeal of Amsterdam, 16 March 2010, (2010) IER no. 78, pp. 513–16 note M.de Cock Buning    22.056

C More v MyP2P, Court of Appeal Den Bosch, 12 January 2010, IER 2010, nr 34 pp. 249–261, notes Seignette and Schaafsma    22.056, 22.057, 22.061

Typisch Enschede v Beeldrecht, Court of Appeal of Arnhem, 20 January 2009, LJN: BH4145; B97658; AMI 2009, p 123–24 22.132, 22.137

Norma c.s.v SONT, State of the Netherlands c.s., Court of Appeal of The Hague, 11 November 2008, B97272; AMI 2009 p. 77    22.094

Leaseweb v Brein, Court of Appeal of Amsterdam, 3 July 2008, IER2008, nr. 67 pp. 274–77    22.056

Vitra v Classic, Court of Appeal of The Hague, 20 March 2008, B95899; IER2008, nr. 59 p. 231 note Madeleine de Cock Buning; BIE 2009, nr. 63 pp. 288–93, with critical note AA Quaedvlieg    22.081

Zoekallehuizen.nl, Court of Appeal of Arnhem, 4 July 2006, AMI 2007, nr. 12 pp. 93–98 note KJ Koelman; IER 2006, nr. 87 p. 308 note HMH Speyaert; Mediaforum 2007, nr. 1 p. 22 note Bart Beuving    22.061, 22.122

Brein v Techno Design (ZoekMP3), Court of Appeal of Amsterdam, 15 June 2006, AMI 2006, pp. 173–179, note KJ Koelman; Mediaforum 2006, pp. 314–319 note Overdijk    22.056

Rowling and Time Warner v Byblos (Harry Potter/Tanja Grotter), Court of Appeal of Amsterdam, 6 November 2003, AMI 2004, nr, 4 pp. 36–42 note RJQ Klomp    22.141

Scientology v Spaink (Operating Thetans), Court of Appeal of The Hague, 4 September 2003, AMI 2003, nr. 18 pp. 217–223, note PB Hugenholtz    22.124

Van Toor v Phantavision, Court of Appeal of Amsterdam, 30 January 2003, AMI 2003, pp. 94–98, note KJ Koelman    22.140, 22.141

BUMA v KaZaA, Court of Appeal of Amsterdam, 28 March 2002, AMI 2002, nr. 13 pp. 134–36 with note Seignette on pp. 142–43; Mediaforum 2002, nr 19 pp. 188–91 note KJ Koelman; Computerrecht 2002, pp. 144–47    22.050

Havermans v Güfa, Court of Appeal of The Hague, 1 December 1994, AMI 1995, p. 51, note Mom    22.041

District and County Courts

Rechtbank Den Haag, Interim Judgment of 12 July 2017, ECLI:NL:RBDHA:2017:7543 2.076, 13.040

District Court of Eastern Brabant, 10 August 2015, (2015) AMI p. 151–152, note J Kabel    22.127

Van Bennekom v IISG, District Court of Amsterdam, 20 May 2015 (2015) AMI p. 122; IEForum 14950    22.146

DMGE v West Music c.s., (‘Hossa logo’), District Court of Central Holland, 22 April 2015, (2015) IER55, p. 393–99    22.074

CWS v Vendorlink, District Court of Midden-Nederland, 25 March 2015, AMI2015, p. 91; IEF 14797    22.035

Acer v State and Nokia v State, District Court of The Hague, 14 January 2015, IEF 14552 22.111

2Houses v Stemra, District Court of North-Holland, 26 November 2014, (2015) AMI no. 2 pp. 18–25 note D.J.G. Visser    22.138

Eredivisie v café Hegeraad, Pres. District Court Amsterdam, 20 November 2014, (2015) AMI p. 27    22.080

NUV v Tom Kabinet, District Court of Amsterdam, 21 July 2014, IE Forum 14055 22.036

Masterfile v ABC Kado, District Court of Amsterdam, 18 December 2013, (2014) AMIp. 68–69, IEF 13384; IEPT20131218 22.139

Brein v ING Bank, District Court of Amsterdam, 14 May 2013, (2013) AMI p. 147, (2013) IER no. 62 p. 480–85, note S. Kulk    22.079

BUMA and STEMRA v Souren, District Court of The Hague, 19 December 2012, (2013) AMI no. 4 p. 84–90 note DJG Visser; (2013) IERno. 38 p. 325–32 note AMEV & E.A. de Groot; (2013) Computerrecht 83; ECLI:NL:RBSGR:2012:CA0291    22.062

Sanoma v GS Media, District Court of Amsterdam, 12 September 2012, (2012) IER no. 4 pp. 29–38 note J.M.B. Seignette; (2013) Computerrecht 7    22.068

District Court of The Hague, 10 May 2012, (2012) Mediaforum no. 20 p 258–68 22.173

District Court of The Hague, 11 January 2012, (2012) Mediaforum no. 19 p 251–57 22.173

Premier League v MyP2P, District Court of The Hague, 22 March 2011, (2011) IER no. 44 pp. 326–36 note JMB Seignette    22.056, 22.060

FTD v Brein, District Court of Haarlem, 9 February 2011, LJN: BP3757 22.095

Pictoright v Art & Allposters, District Court of Roermond, 22 September 2010, (2011) AMI pp. 25–31, note A.C. Beunen    22.034

District Court of The Hague, 23 June 2010, AMI 2010, nr. 14 pp. 175–79 note KJ Koelman    22.094, 22.162

FTD v Eyeworks (Usenet), District Court of The Hague, 2 June 2010, (2010) IER, no. 80, pp. 522–25, B98881 (in English translation)    22.058

Mercis & Bruna v Punt.nl, District Court of Amsterdam, provisional measure, 22 December 2009, LJN: BK7383; B98482; AMI2010, nr.12 pp. 127–32, note DJG Visser; IER 2010, nr 23 pp. 188–95, note FW Grosheide    22.143

Brein v The Pirate Bay, District Court of Amsterdam, 22 October 2009, LJN: BK1067 22.056

Brein v Mininova, District Court of Utrecht, 26 August 2009, LJN BJ6008, IER2009, nr. 60 p. 255    22.056

Karel Appel Stichting v X, District Court of Utrecht (provisional measure), 25 March 2009, IER 2009, nr. 39 pp. 177–182, note Madeleine de Cock Buning; AMI 2009, pp. 125–126    22.125, 22.161

Cassina v Dimensione, District Court of Amsterdam (provisional measures), 19 February 2009, AMI 2009, nr 9 pp. 101–105 note Mireille van Eechoud    22.081

Norma v NL Kabel, District Court of The Hague, 28 January 2009, AMI 2009, nr 17 pp. 163–69, note KJ Koelman.    22.040

ACI Adam, Imation and other importers and producers of blank recording media/ Thuiskopie and SONT, District Court of The Hague, 25 June 2008, AMI 2008, nr. 14, pp. 146–52 note Cyril van der Net    22.163, 22.164

De Groene leguaan v Frieslandbank, District Court of Leeuwarden (on the merits), 5 February 2008, AMI 2008, p 76–79, note DJG Visser 22.133, 22.165

Brein v Share connector, District Court of Amsterdam, 24 January 2008, IER 2008, nr 61 pp. 239–43, note Madeleine de Cock Buning    22.056

Stichting Nederlands Fonds voor de Film v TROS (China Blue), District Court of Amsterdam, 6 June 2007, AMI 2008, nr. 1, pp. 16–20, note MR de Zwaan    22.157

District Court of Den Bosch, 16 May 2007, AMI 2007, p 133–5, note Visser 22.119

Stokke v Marktplaats, District Court of Zwolle/Lelystad, 14 March 2007, BIE nr.140 pp. 658–73, at 662; IER 2007, nr. 73 note H Struik    22.010, 22.161

Brein v KPN (Dutchtorrent), District Court of The Hague, 5 January 2007, AMI 2007, nr. 9 p 55–57, note Ot van Daalen 22.056

District Court of Amsterdam, 22 December 2006, LJN: AZ5624; AMI2007, p. 62    22.142

Nederlands Foto Museum v Uitgeverij 010, District Court of Rotterdam, 21 November 2006, LJN: AZ3514; AMI2007, nr. 6, pp. 29–31 note Visser    22.123

NVM Makelaars v ZAH, District Court of Arnhem, 16 March 2006, AMI2006, nr 8, pp. 97–100 note Chr. A. Alberdingk Thijm, Computerrecht 2006, nr 73 p 173, note H Struik    22.061, 22.122

Tellegen v Codemasters, District Court of Amsterdam, 21 September 2005, AMI 2005, nr. 16 pp. 204–207, note KJ Koelman; IER2005, nr. 84 note J Kabel    22.131, 22.137

De Groene leguaan v Frieslandbank, District Court of Leeuwarden (provisional measure), 9 April 2005, AMI 2006, nr.5 pp. 67–69, note JMB Seignette    22.133, 22.165

Digital press clipping services, NDP/Staat, District Court of The Hague, 2 March 2005, AMI 2005, nr. 9 pp. 103–7 note JMB Seignette; IER 2005, nr. 35, pp. 158–163 note Madeleine de Cock Buning    22.121, 22.158

Schlijper v Nieuw Rechts, County Court of Rotterdam, 3 September 2004, AMI 2005, nr. 5 pp. 69–71 note KJ Koelman    22.061

Techno Design v Brein, District Court of Haarlem, 12 May 2004, (2004) AMI, no. 15 pp. 185–93, note K.J. Koelman    22.055

District Court of Leeuwarden, 30 October 2003, AMI 2004, nr. 3 pp. 32–5 note Koelman    22.061

SLDE and Philips v Intergro and Vomar, District Court of Amsterdam, (provisional measure), 19 September 2002, AMI 2003, pp. 29–32, note KJ Koelman    22.007

BUMA/KaZaA, District Court of Amsterdam, 29 November 2001, (2002) AMI nr. 4 pp. 21–25 note Hugenholtz; (2002) Computerrecht, pp. 45–9    22.049

Kranten.com, President of the District Court Rotterdam, 22 August 2000, IER 2000, p. 268 note EJ Arkenbout; Computerrecht 2000, p. 259 note H. Struik; Informatierecht AMI 2000, p. 205 note KJ Koelman; Mediaforum 2000, nr.63 p. 344 note TFW Overdijk    22.061

Glennie v Gamepoint, District Court of Arnhem, 31 May 2000, Mediaforum 2000, nr. 64 pp. 353–6 note Visse    22.061

Poland

Supreme Court, Judgment of 28 September 2005, case number I CK 164/05 23.46

Wolters Kluwer Polska Spółka Akcjna in Warsaw v FS File Solutoons Ltd.in Nicosia (Cyprus), VI ACz 164/17, Court of Appeal in Warsaw VI Civil Division, 27 March 2017 2.222

Court of Appeal in Warsaw, Judgment of 7 May 2014, case number I ACa 1663/13 23.24

Regional Administrative Court of Warsaw, Judgment of 30 November 2008, case number II SA/Wa 1885/07 23.53

Regional Administrative Court of Warsaw, Judgment of 4 April 2008, case number III SA/Wa 301/08 23.47

Portugal

Constitutional Court

Decision No. 616/2003, December 2003 24.040

Supreme Court

Decision No. 15/2013, Procedure No.124/11.9GAPVL.G1-A.S1 24.018

Romania

Constitutional Court

Decision no. 1029/2010 published in Official Gazette no. 727/1 November 2010 25.70

Decision no. 596/2009 published in Official Gazette no. 357/27 May 2009 25.70

Decision no. 504/2007 published in Official Gazette no. 461/9 July 2007 25.70

High Court of Cassation and Justice 1st Civil Section (‘HCCJ S1’)

Decision no. 2004/21 October 2016 25.25

Decision no. 2148/12 October 2015 25.52

Decision no. 1610/12 June 2015, Case docket No. 22023/3/2011 25.70, 25.75

Decision no. 1109/24 April 2015, Case docket No. 73281/3/2011 25.35

Decision no. 340/30 January 2015, Case docket No. 49854/3/2008 25.05

Decision no. 3166/14 November 2014, Case docket No. 38503/3/2012 25.14

Decision no. 889/18 March 2014, Case docket No. 54621/3/2011 25.33

Decision no. 880/17 March 2014, Case docket No. 33034/3/2009 25.57

Decision no. 880/7 March 2014, Case docket No. 33034/3/2009 25.57

Decision no. 4815/25 October 2013, Case docket No. 9561/3/2009 25.11

Decision no. 1127/5 March 2013 25.34

Decision no. 5043/29 June 2012, Case docket No. 15276/3/2007 25.50

Bucharest Court of Appeal

Decision no. 607A/19 December 2015 25.05

Decision no. 635A/18.12. 2015, Case docket No. 7116/3/2010 25.18, 25.46

Decision no. 3360/15 December 2015 25.45, 25.47

Decision no. 198A/7 April 2015 25.51

Decision no. 235A/29 May 2014, Case docket No. 38503/3/2012 25.17

Decision no. 234A/5 December 2013, Case docket No. 22023/3/2011 25.71

Decision no. 118A/19 June 2013, Case docket No. 8772/2/2011 25.13

Decision no. 178A/4 December 2012 25.39

Decision no. 153A/12 May 2011, Case docket No. 10141/2/2010 25.45, 25.46, 25.78

Decision no. 114A/5 April 2011, Case docket No. 4.013/2/2010 25.06, 25.12, 25.32

Bucharest Tribunal

Sentence no. 1169/23. 09. 2014, Case docket No. 36942/3/2013 25.68

Romanian Copyright Office Decisions

Decision no. 21/2016 published in the Official Gazette Part I, no. 226/28 March 2016 25.41

Decision no. 55/2014 published in the Official Gazette, Part I, no 428/11 June 2014 25.12

Decision no. 284/2010, published in the Official Gazette, Part I no. 668/30 September 2010 25.46

Decision no. 180/2010 published in the Official Gazette Part I, no. 273/27 April 2010, modified through ORDA Decision no. 204/2011 published in the Official Gazette Part I, no. 420/27 May 2011 25.06

Decision no. 399/2006 published in the Official Gazette Part I, no. 982/8 December 2006 25.45, 25.47

Slovak Republic

Constitutional Court, dossier number PL. ÚS 25/2015–41, dated 18.2.2015 26.104

Ministry of Culture, Opinion No. MK-2426/2015–230/12473 of 17 August 2015 26.089

Slovenia

Constitutional Court

Constitutional Court US, 91/2011, 54/2015, 38/2016, 27/2017 27.45

Supreme Court

Supreme Court of the RS (VSRS) III Ips 141/2015 of 18 February 2015 27.45

Supreme Court of the RS, case II Ips 511/2004 of 24 May 2006 27.43

Supreme Court of the RS, case II Ips 742/2005 of 12 January 2006 27.43

Supreme Court (VSRS), case II Ips 29/2004 of 27 October 2005 27.35

Supreme Court (VSRS) II Ips 47/2003 of 29 January 2004 27.43

Supreme Court (VSRS), case II Ips 8/2000 of 29 June 2000 27.43

Higher Court of Ljubljana

Higher Court of Ljubljana, II Cp 2216/2005 of 6 July 2005 27.43

Higher Court of Ljubljana, II Cp 1722/2003 of 22 October 2003 27.32

Higher Court of Ljubljana, I Cp 2089/99 of 14 March 2001 27.43

Higher Court of Ljubljana [2000] I Cp 510/99 published in [2002] ECDR,p.187 27.43

District Court of Ljubljana

District Court of Ljubljana, VII Pg 1895/2007 27.29

Spain

Constitutional Court

Constitutional Court Decision nº 123/2010 (B.O.E. nº4 January 5, 2011) 28.055

Supreme Court

Supreme Court (Criminal) decision of 12 December 2016, confirming the decision by Audiencia Nacional (Criminal) of 5 February 2016 (case youkioske) 28.144

Supreme Court Order of 10 November 2016 28.062

Supreme Court Decree of Sept. 10, 2014 28.059

Supreme Court Decision 172/2012, of April 3, 2012 28.043

Supreme Court Sentence 7952/2006, of November 11, 2006 28.055

Court of Appeals

Court of Appeals of Barcelona, sec. 15, sentence of 20 February 2018 28.165

Court of Appeals of Barcelona, sec. 15, sentence of 7 July 2011 28.052

Court of Appeals of Barcelona, Sec. 15, sentence of Sept. 17, 2008 28.034

Mercantile Court

Mercantile Court of Barcelona, 29 January 2018 (Columbia and others v Telefonica and others) 2.220

Mercantile Court of Barcelona, Section 6, decision of 12 January 2017 28.165

Mercantile Court of Barcelona, Section 2, decision of 25 July 2016 28.165

Mercantile Court of Madrid n. 6bis, decision of February 28, 2011 28.052

Sweden

Supreme Court

Supreme Court, NJA 2017 s. 446 29.113

Supreme Court, NJA 2017 s. 75 29.011

Supreme Court, NJA 2016 s. 212 29.068, 29.074

Supreme Court, NJA 2015 s. 1097 29.051

Supreme Court, NJA 2014 s. 859 29.113

Supreme Court, NJA 2012 s. 975 29.042, 29.061

Supreme Court, NJA 2010 s. 559 29.023

Supreme Court, NJA 2010 s. 135 29.029

Supreme Court, NJA 2005 s. 180 29.103

Supreme Court, NJA 2000 s. 292 29.041

Courts of Appeal

Svea Court of Appeal, docket no T-2028–08 29.020

Svea Court of Appeal docket no Ö10146–09 29.115

Svea Court of Appeal docket no Ö7131–09 29.116

Svea Court of Appeal docket no Ö8773–09 29.116

Svea Court of Appeal, docket no B 4041–09 29.060

Svea Court of Appeal, docket no B 2160–12 29.022

Court of Appeal for Skåne och Blekinge, docket no T 2763–16 29.036

Court of Appeal for Skåne and Blekinge, docket no FT 2090–08 29.089

Other courts

Patent- and Market Appeal Court docket, no PMT 3547–17 29.037

Patent- and Market Appeal Court, docket no. PMT 11706–15 29.119

Stockholm District Court docket, no B 13301–06 29.052

Patent- and Market Court, docket no PMT 8448–14 29.068

Patent- and Market Court, docket no B 9635–16 29.103

Patent- and Market Appeal Court docket, no PMT 3547–17 29.037

Patent- and Market Appeal Court, docket no. PMT 11706–15 29.119

Stockholm District Court docket, no B 13301–06 29.052

Patent- and Market Court, docket no PMT 8448–14 29.068

Patent- and Market Court, docket no B 9635–16 29.103

United Kingdom

American Cynamid Co v Ethicon Ltd. [1975] 2 WLR 316 7.49

Anton Piller KG v Manufacturing Processes Ltd. [1975] EWCA Civ. 12 7.50

Autospin (Oil Seals) Ltd. v Beehive Spinning [1995] RPC 683 30.15

BASCA v Secretary of State for Business, Innovations and Skills, [2015] EWHC 1723 (Admin), [2015] RPC 26 2.126, 30.47, 30.56

Cartier International AG and others v British Sky Broadcasting Ltd. and others, [2014] EWHC 3794 (Ch) 2.222

Designer Guild v Russell Williams [2001] 1 WLR 2416 (HL) 30.16

Dramatico Entertainment Ltd. v British Sky Broadcasting Ltd [2012] EWHC 268, [2012] RPC 27 30.30

England and Wales Cricket Board Ltd. v Tixdaq Ltd.and Fanatix Ltd [2016] EWHC 575 (Ch); [2016] RPC 21 30.17

FAPL v QC Leisure [2012] EWCA Civ1708.FAPL v QC Leisure (No.3) [2012] EWHC 108 (Ch); [2012] FSR 12 30.23

Football Dataco v Stan James [2010] EWCA Civ 1380; [2011] RPC 9 30.10

Hubbard & Anor v Vosper & Anor. [1972] 2 QB 84 16.056

Hyperion Records v Sawkins [2005] EWCA Civ 565; [2005] RPC 32 (CA) 30.09

Ladbroke (Football) Ltd. v William Hill (Football) Ltd [1964] 1 WLR 273 (HL) 30.09, 30.16

Newspaper Licensing Agency v Marks & Spencer Ltd [2003] 1 AC 551 30.16

Newspaper Licensing Agency v Meltwater [2011] EWCA 890 30.09, 30.17

Nintendo Company Ltd. v Playables Ltd [2010] EWHC 1931 (Ch) 2.193

Norowzian v Arks (No.1) [1998] FSR 394 30.14

Norowzian v Arks (No.2) [2000] FSR 363 30.14

Norwich Pharmacal Company and Others v Customs & Excise Commissioners [1974] AC 133 16.092, 16.106, 16.112

Nova v Mazooma [2007] EWCA Civ 219; [2007] RPC 25 30.11

Paramount Home Entertainment International Ltd.and others v British Sky Broadcasting and others (unreported, 18 February 2014) 2.226

SAS Institute Inc. v World Programming Ltd [2013] EWCA Civ 1482; [2014] RPC 8 30.10

SAS Institute Inc. v World Programming Ltd [2013] EWHC 69 (Ch) 30.12

Temple Island Collections Ltd. v New English Teas Ltd [2012] EWPCC 1; [2012] FSR 9 30.09

The Queen, on the application of (1) British Academy of Songwriters, Composers and Authors (2) Musicians’ Union (3) UK Music 2009 Ltd; Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills; and the Incorporated Society of Musicians [2015] EWCH 2041 (Admin); Case No: CO/5444/2014 16.077

Twentieth Century Fox Films v Newzbin [2010] EWHC 608 (Ch); [2010] FSR 21 2.043, 30.25

University of London Press Ltd. v University Tutorial Press Ltd. [1916] 2 Ch 601 21.03

Walter v Lane [1900] AC 539 (HL) 30.09

Williamson Music Ltd. v Pearson Partnership [1987] FSR 97 30.32

United States

Spanski Enterprises Inc. v Telewizja Polska S.A, 17–7051 (D.C.Cir.2018) 1.081

Am. Broad. Cos. Inc. v Aereo Inc., 134 S. Ct. 2498 (2014) 1.079

US Capitol Records, LLC v ReDigi, Inc., 934 FSupp 2d 640 (S.D.N.Y., 30 March 2013) –appealed 1.084

Capitol Records v Thomas 579 F.Supp. 2d 1210 D. Minn. (2008) 1.079

MGM Studios, Inc. v Grokster, Ltd., 545 US, 125 S. Ct. 2764 (2005) 22.056

Universal City Studios Inc. v Reimerdes, 111 F.Supp. 2d 294 (S.D.N.Y. 2000) 1.058

Harper & Row Publishers v Nation Enterprises, US Supreme Court of 20 May 1985, 471 US 539 (1985) 1.040